[ Index ][ Official Thread ][ Bottom ]
FEDICHAN


(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 13/01/20(Mon)22:42:41 id:1578973361 No. 1

my mastodon account got deleted because of alleged "transphobic" statements
>
>Let's see how "free" THIS site is:
>If you're born with a dick and balls you're NOT a woman
>If you're born with a pussy and ovaries you're NOT a man
>
>FUCK YOU

(@oxbowcoda@freespeechextremist.com) 13/01/20(Mon)23:31:56 id:1578976316 No. 2 >>6

OK boomer.

(@igeljaeger@jpop.club) 14/01/20(Tue)01:41:47 id:1578984107 No. 3 >>42

exactly a controversial statement to make on FSE

(@wowaname@anime.website) 14/01/20(Tue)01:44:02 id:1578984242 No. 4 >>17

im a tranny and i would even let you post that shit here
>
>step it up, lets see what you really got

(@Oblivia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)01:45:58 id:1578984358 No. 5

welcome to HELL baby
>

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)01:35:37 id:1578983737 No. 6 >>7 >>56

>>2

>
>Fuck off Nazi.

(@oxbowcoda@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)01:37:04 id:1578983824 No. 7 >>8 >>27

>>6
Lol. How did you come to the conclusion that I'm a nazi? I'm genuinely curious.

(@meowski@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)01:59:40 id:1578985180 No. 8 >>9 >>29 >>429

>>7
this user is a troll. it's here to bash the fash or smth

(@oxbowcoda@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)02:01:13 id:1578985273 No. 9 >>10 >>16

>>8
I don't think this person is just pretending to be retarded tbh.

(@meowski@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)02:03:59 id:1578985439 No. 10 >>11 >>13 >>31

>>9
yea i think it's an antifa that is on a crusade to troll the free speech extremists. no meme, genuinely retarded

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)02:05:08 id:1578985508 No. 11 >>12

>>10

>
>Fuck you and Antifa arseholes. You're just a narrow-minded fuckstick

(@meowski@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)02:06:38 id:1578985598 No. 12 >>30

>>11
kek

(@oxbowcoda@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)02:05:19 id:1578985519 No. 13 >>14

>>10
We have all been bamboozled.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)02:06:12 id:1578985572 No. 14 >>15

>>13

>
>You've all fallen victim to your own fucked up prejudices.

(@oxbowcoda@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)02:10:51 id:1578985851 No. 15 >>32 >>33

>>14
Nobody has any idea wtf you're talking about. Go be a retard somewhere else.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)02:02:57 id:1578985377 No. 16 >>28

>>9

>
>
>

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)01:57:52 id:1578985072 No. 17 >>18

>>4
That's it, and that was "worse" than what I got banned for. You've narrow-mindedly assumed that I give a shit.

(@wowaname@anime.website) 14/01/20(Tue)02:36:43 id:1578987403 No. 18 >>19

>>17
damn you bamboozled me

(@daughter) 14/01/20(Tue)02:41:27 id:1578987687 No. 19 >>20

>>18

>
>judenfreund v folk cagematch when

(@11112011@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)02:52:58 id:1578988378 No. 20 >>21

>>19
mud pit

(@MisterRogersSnapped@kiwifarms.cc) 14/01/20(Tue)03:04:35 id:1578989075 No. 21 >>22

>>20

>
>jello pool?
>
>Two "men" enter, no "men" leave?

(@daughter) 14/01/20(Tue)03:05:32 id:1578989132 No. 22 >>23 >>24

>>21

>
>Are any of you efash not closeted af?

(@11112011@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)03:08:01 id:1578989281 No. 23

>>22
ts apropriate for folk and the dude it was the point

(@MisterRogersSnapped@kiwifarms.cc) 14/01/20(Tue)03:13:18 id:1578989598 No. 24 >>25

>>22
efash? what a clever way not to say "fuck off nazi."
>
>I think you may have fallen victim to your own narrow minded fucked up prejudices. I am paraphrasing, of course.
>
>:D

(@daughter) 14/01/20(Tue)03:14:40 id:1578989680 No. 25 >>26

>>24

>
>It was just an easy joke, tbh.

(@MisterRogersSnapped@kiwifarms.cc) 14/01/20(Tue)03:15:21 id:1578989721 No. 26

>>25
mine, too. no beef.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)02:00:28 id:1578985228 No. 27

>>7

>
>I'm just being "woke", ie "anyone who doesn't think 100% the same as me is a Nazi".

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)08:45:57 id:1579009557 No. 28 >>34 >>36

>>16

>
> Regular situation
> Star of David ring on the middle finger (Is that you in the photo?)
> "Redneck Jew" shirt
> Luis Vuitton yarmulke
>

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)02:04:17 id:1578985457 No. 29

>>8

>
>no, you're the trolls, trolling me

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)02:07:05 id:1578985625 No. 30

>>12

>
>kok

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)02:10:54 id:1578985854 No. 31 >>690

>>10

>
>Guess what?
>
>I'm not ashamed of being white, not ashamed of being heterosexual and not ashamed of being male. I was born as a white, heterosexual male and had no choice in the matter. Are you ashamed of being a fascist pig?

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)02:11:39 id:1578985899 No. 32

>>15

>
>Yawn. You're a very boring troll. Try harder, you try-hard.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)02:13:45 id:1578986025 No. 33

>>15

>
>You're the one who came up to me, you stupid, forgetful heap of shit.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)09:01:01 id:1579010461 No. 34 >>35

>>28
...Maybe the ring outranks the "Redneck Jew" shirt, I don't know.
>
>Anyway, the winrar is the LV yarmulke. The ultimate in Equipment .

(@oxbowcoda@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)09:03:43 id:1579010623 No. 35

>>34
When someone says "I'm going to show you a pic of a Luis Vuitton yarmulke" this is not the kind of existentialist photography one expects to be confronted with. Like imagine the smell.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)09:08:43 id:1579010923 No. 36 >>37

>>28

>
>yup, proud non-Jewish member of the JDL (JDL-Germany/Jüdische Verteidigungsliga)
>
>PS: the finger pic below is just for demonstration purposes, not directed at you; the Polish article is about the "Berlin trägt Kippa" day, where lots of people wore a kippah/yarmulke to show solidarity with the Jewish community
>

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)09:09:57 id:1579010997 No. 37 >>38

>>36

>
>oops, I'd written about the Polish article but forgotten to actually include the screenshot. D'oh!!!
>

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)09:16:43 id:1579011403 No. 38 >>39 >>40 >>46 >>55 >>62

>>37
Man, I ain't know how to read Polish, they ain't even use real letters, they just draw shapes on regular letters.

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)09:20:39 id:1579011639 No. 39 >>43 >>45

>>38
roka can read polish, maybe they can give a brief summary?

(@karolat) 14/01/20(Tue)09:22:53 id:1579011773 No. 40 >>47

>>38
this!! this is why i could never learn despite my parents' efforts!

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)09:34:36 id:1579012476 No. 41 >>44 >>78

transgender is utopian. They basically want a cyberpunk future style post-gender thing.
>
>"just go back to 1800 gender relations" is delusional so you're going to get a lot of "OK Boomer"s. We have some techno-primitivists on here like who are quite good (3 std dev iq above median), and that is a real, if also utopian, angle, and widely respected even among trans activists provided some reasonable allowances.
>
>Unfortunately, the future probably will look more like the left side of this jpg.
>

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)09:35:32 id:1579012532 No. 42 >>51

>>3
yeh there are already a bunch of what I suppose is best called tradfags on here.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)09:24:47 id:1579011887 No. 43 >>48 >>49 >>52

>>39

>
>Yeah, sorry, I've actually got a screenshot of the translated page, should have posted that as well. Here it is (don't know how good that translation is, of course):
>

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)10:06:45 id:1579014405 No. 44 >>54 >>57 >>58

>>41
man don't go around nuero-doxing me, I just tell people my IQ when they're IQ fetishists cause I think its bullshit.
>what makes me speshul is I'm wise and compassionate ;)
>forreal doe I have a unique perspective (as we all do, but you know what I mean) that I'll share but I don't like appeals to IQ. it makes me uncomfortable when other people talk about it lol, kinda like I'll say I'm cute but get kinda wigged when others say it.
>I'm not opposed to transhumanism because I think the idea of combining man with technology is bad, although I do have an orthodox no-strong ai take on the Chinese room, I'm opposed cause the people leading it despite being 150 IQ nibbas are fucking psychopaths and I don't want them to live forever. if the future on the right would actually happen I'd be thrilled.
>@Judenfreund

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)10:07:13 id:1579014433 No. 45 >>53

>>39
Oh, not necessary, it's been summarized already. (Xeno can also.) It's an anti-fascist party in Poland, I don't think there's much to say in the way of news. If any country is going to be highly anti-fascist, it's Poland.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)09:21:44 id:1579011704 No. 46

>>38

>
>It's also a bit of a tongue twister language for non-native speakers, believe you me.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)10:12:22 id:1579014742 No. 47

>>40
It's one of those made-up languages Europeans like to use as a prank. Europeans all speak English, French, Italian, Latin, or Russian. All other purported European languages were invented as a prank to play on English and American people, except some odd dialects that also aren't real languages. (For example, Spanish is just Italian with a lisp and German is a creole of English and French. Romanian is not real, just look at the spelling. These are obviously invented as jokes.) Danish was an attempt to see exactly how gullible English-speakers really were.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)10:12:40 id:1579014760 No. 48 >>81

>>43
Links work, too.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)09:30:48 id:1579012248 No. 49 >>50

>>43

>
>Alright, I gotta go now, guys - gotta visit my dear, departed "Sternchen" (pet name) at the cemetery where we buried her 11 years ago today. Byeeeeeeeee....

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)10:13:05 id:1579014785 No. 50 >>82

>>49
Ah, sorry to hear it, hope the visit goes well.

(@igeljaeger@jpop.club) 14/01/20(Tue)10:13:48 id:1579014828 No. 51

>>42
facepalm

(@roka@pl.smuglo.li) 14/01/20(Tue)10:15:08 id:1579014908 No. 52 >>84

>>43
translation is mostly fine, just a bit wonky in places. Kek'd at machine translated „Polka” handle (translated as „the shelf” because algorithm thought it was „półka”, real translation being „a female Pole”)

(@roka@pl.smuglo.li) 14/01/20(Tue)10:21:18 id:1579015278 No. 53 >>59

>>45
*an article in Polish about a German grassroots action of solidarity with Jews in face of Muslim aggression

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)10:25:55 id:1579015555 No. 54 >>86

>>44
my fresh take is that before we augment humankind's ability to interface with the universe (ie computing power) we should augment our ability to interface with one another, and with all living things. radical empathy, man.
>
>@fluffy

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)10:27:05 id:1579015625 No. 55

>>38
poles hate vowels, its a pathology for them
>@Judenfreund

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)10:28:55 id:1579015735 No. 56

>>6
was joking man
>@oxbowcoda

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)10:48:34 id:1579016914 No. 57 >>60 >>65

>>44

>
>> it makes me uncomfortable when other people talk about it
>
>I used to be uncomfortable with it, but IQ's as real as any other metric. I think the discomfort comes from the collective American myth of egalitarianism. Don't misunderstand: when I say "collective myth" here, I mean it is a fragment of the mythological structure we have built that allows our culture to function, not in the sense of a commonly believed falsehood.
>
>The reality is that we're all better off if we believe it in the inherent value of all humans rather than the opposite. IQ isn't the only metric of value, it's just a way to measure general intelligence; if it were, then IQ would trend upwards across generations, but it's been flat at least as long as we've had writing. We're all too stupid to accurately gauge human value, and a conscious belief in radical egalitarianism is what lets us hedge against making stupid decisions based on assuming the opposite. That is, the blind spots created by egalitarianism are less harmful to our society than the blind spots created by caste systems or authoritarian systems.
>
>So our collective myth gives us organizations that, if they're operating properly, let merit rise to the top and compel the top to listen to the bottom. I'm happier that way, I think most people are. Some people like the comfort of being a cog or wish they didn't have to compete so hard, this pushes them towards belief in more rigid hierarchies or some kind of Harrison Bergeron situation.

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)10:57:02 id:1579017422 No. 58

>>44
lol okay.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)11:01:46 id:1579017706 No. 59

>>53
Ah, haha, okay, that's a thing.
>
>I wish I could find it, I saw a clip a long time back of a Muslim in Germany waving a flag with a swastika on it, which is illegal in Germany, but as I recall, the cops pushed back the people trying to take the flag. Something like that, the cops were protecting the people with the swastika, I don't think they arrested the counter-demonstators, but my recollection is fuzzy, which is both why I'd like to find it and why I have trouble finding it.

(@grips@cawfee.club) 14/01/20(Tue)11:09:09 id:1579018149 No. 60 >>61 >>63

>>57
>IQ isn't the only metric of value, it's just a way to measure general intelligence; if it were, then IQ would trend upwards across generations
>
>it's not that simple, though maybe I'm misunderstanding:
>>Test score increases have been continuous and approximately linear from the earliest years of testing to the present. For the Raven's Progressive Matrices test, a study published in the year 2009 found that British children's average scores rose by 14 IQ points from 1942 to 2008. Similar gains have been observed in many other countries in which IQ testing has long been widely used, including other Western European countries, Japan, and South Korea.
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)11:18:09 id:1579018689 No. 61 >>64

>>60

>yeah, the flynn effect is a thing. but regardless I agree with p. everything a cost-benefit analysis and its best to err on the side of egalitarianism.
>@p

(@dwaltiz@pleroma.soykaf.com) 14/01/20(Tue)11:38:50 id:1579019930 No. 62

>>38
ąęóśłżćń
>
>@Judenfreund

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)11:44:07 id:1579020247 No. 63 >>76

>>60
just correlation.
>
>What causes IQ testing to become widespread? What's going on in a country where that happens?
>
>> 1942
>
>Kids did worse on a standardized test in the middle of wartime while the testing was still in flux than they do now?
>
>There's plenty of reason to criticize IQ, but it's fairly well-studied and the tests have improved quite a bit over the years. Casting doubt here and there is fine, but doesn't discredit the metric. There does not seem to be a way to make stupid people smart, though, and it's nearly impossible to argue that nobody is more or less intelligent than anyone else.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)11:47:50 id:1579020470 No. 64

>>61
"Potest ex casa magnus vir exire." (Seneca, "A great man can come from a hut.") There's also "God is no respecter of persons." though that is slightly newer.
>
>It's not an especially new idea, however it is an idea that has had plenty of success.

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)11:58:10 id:1579021090 No. 65 >>66 >>67 >>69

>>57
qualm with IQ isnt a qualm with its value as a tool for quantifying general intelligence or quantifying general intelligence itself. its the value of what we call general intelligence-- which is basically "amount of words and facts the person knows and ability to find visual patterns". I mean that correlates well with many metrics of life success (which are also subjective) but I wouldn't call GI a good measure for what IMO is the most important facet of what people call intellect-- which is not rote memorization or human calculator tricks, its creative intelligence, or genius. another flaw is that farther than 3 standard deviations from the mean (four at most) the statistics themselves get iffy because of dearth of data, and at that point one question gotten wrong or correct can increase a persons calculated IQ by like 10 points. so when people claim to have an IQ of like 180 on the interwebs I'm like sure thing bro, tests don't go that high.
>@Judenfreund

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)12:08:23 id:1579021703 No. 66 >>73

>>65
I find nothing to object to in the 3stddev part.
>
>I don't think creativity can be quantified, and like I said, IQ isn't the only metric that matters. I agree that it is misapplied, possibly doomed to be misapplied in perpetuity. It's just easier to reduce everything to a scalar and guess which number is bigger, so it's gonna get misapplied.

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 14/01/20(Tue)12:11:44 id:1579021904 No. 67 >>68

>>65

@georgia my iq is 200 im big brain - you wouldnt understand because you are woman my brain peen, my e peen and my real peen are all biger than youures

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)12:21:37 id:1579022497 No. 68 >>70

>>67
real peen??

(@Lennart@spinster.xyz) 14/01/20(Tue)12:11:25 id:1579021885 No. 69 >>71 >>97

>>65

@georgia
>yeah lol @ those lying nerds anyways my IQ is 179

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 14/01/20(Tue)12:22:12 id:1579022532 No. 70 >>88

>>68

@fluffy ok the real thing is barely a pinky tbh

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)12:23:03 id:1579022583 No. 71 >>72

>>69
lmao I am instance blocked on spinster
>Rip lennart he was funny guy

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)12:23:44 id:1579022624 No. 72

>>71
lel
>

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)12:40:52 id:1579023652 No. 73 >>74 >>75

>>66
standardized tests and creativity are pretty much mutually exclusive
>@Judenfreund

(@Lennart@spinster.xyz) 14/01/20(Tue)12:51:41 id:1579024301 No. 74

>>73

@georgia
>fucking EXCUSE me??
>https://www.buzzfeed.com/natalyalobanova/how-creative-are-you

(@Lennart@spinster.xyz) 14/01/20(Tue)12:52:14 id:1579024334 No. 75

>>73

@georgia
>fucking EXCUSE me??
>https://www.buzzfeed.com/natalyalobanova/how-creative-are-you

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:09:18 id:1579025358 No. 76 >>77 >>103

>>63
does not seem to be a way to make stupid people smart"
>@grips

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:10:45 id:1579025445 No. 77

>>76

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:17:30 id:1579025850 No. 78 >>79 >>80 >>96

>>41

>
>My little rant was just me provoking FreeSpeechExtremist.com to see what would happen to my account here. I don't hate trans people, I hate the fact that I was judged transphobic and deleted by Mastodon. THAT was what provoked me into writing my little shitfit here. However, considering trans people, I AM of the opinion that trans-females should NEVER EVER be allowed to participate in, ie should be BANNED from participating in, sporting competitions against natural-born females - for the same reason that natural-born females doped up on steroids etc are BANNED from competitions because of UNFAIR ADVANTAGE! Also, people like "Jessica" Yaniv get right up my nose. That bloke's just a sick mofo - google him(!) and his(!) predilection for little girls. There's just too many sick fucks like him, unfortunately, who are totally destroying any progress that original feminists (NOT modern rad-fems) and sincere trans-females have made. Blaire White, a SINCERE trans-female made a couple of YouTube videos last year, regarding this J Yaniv sick fuck, that everyone should watch IMHO. Google "Blaire White Jessica Yaniv" (without the quotation marks, of course), watch her vids (I have no problem using the female pronoun for honest, sincere Blaire White) and you'll see what I mean.
>
>Love and Peace to everyone ...
>except:
>- anti-semites of any colour or gender
>- white supremacists
>- sick fucks like JY and people who support sick fucks like JY.
>
>PS: I think that posting the attached image file was probably what got me deleted off Mastodon. I hadn't visited Mastodon for quite a while, tried to the other day, found I'd been deleted and then found out that it was because of "Transphobia" (without telling me WHAT EXACTLY I'd done) by checking the email account that I'd used to register on Mastodon.
>

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:21:03 id:1579026063 No. 79 >>85 >>91

>>78
bro thanks for the reply, I will get to it soon. It is too long for me to read in detail right now, can you restate in a more concise fashion, because I am interested in your perspective?

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:21:39 id:1579026099 No. 80 >>87 >>99 >>222

>>78

>
>> just me provoking FreeSpeechExtremist.com to see what would happen to my account here.
>
>Man, if that's what you've got, then you'll have to try *way* harder. Like on the "trying to see if FSE will ban me" scale, that didn't even register.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:23:00 id:1579026180 No. 81

>>48

>
>I don't have the links, I've just got my screenshots

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:24:40 id:1579026280 No. 82 >>83

>>50

>
>Thank you. It was both good and bad/sad, of course, you know.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:25:40 id:1579026340 No. 83 >>165

>>82
Indeed.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:25:45 id:1579026345 No. 84

>>52

(@mewmew@blob.cat) 14/01/20(Tue)13:26:14 id:1579026374 No. 85 >>90

>>79

>* Mastodon bad
>* Traps shouldn't be in sports
>* Why is my pp hard?

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:27:13 id:1579026433 No. 86

>>54

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:29:49 id:1579026589 No. 87 >>92

>>80
I thought he was doing a genuine introduction tbh not something trolly.
>
>Now I feel tricked

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:34:00 id:1579026840 No. 88 >>89

>>70

>
>Pinky and The Brain, eh?

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 14/01/20(Tue)13:34:36 id:1579026876 No. 89

>>88

@Judenfreund

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:36:09 id:1579026969 No. 90 >>98

>>85
all legitimate questions and positions that are not even very controversial tbh. Some might say they are wrong, but nobody will say you can't make some argument for it.
>
>Compare it to what someone wrote yesterday, that men are parasites to women, which is total nonsense on the surface level. But even then, whatever I mean it's all your opinion we can disagree on stuff it's not some big deal to disagree, new and fresh takes teach you so I'm happy to be at fse and hear them.
>
>Not sure why people would ban you for having wrong political opinions it's just politics bro we're just posting opinions in between sets at the gym.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:37:01 id:1579027021 No. 91

>>79

>
>Ummm, no, sorry, can't be condensed, every word counts in what I wrote to you. Sorry if it's too long.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:40:40 id:1579027240 No. 92 >>93

>>87

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:43:31 id:1579027411 No. 93 >>94

>>92
man, is this really how you want to do your first impression?
>
>Well I guess it is a little funny

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:48:38 id:1579027718 No. 94 >>95

>>93

>
>What first impression? I've been here since the neo-Nazi c*nts got me kicked off gab about 1½ weeks ago

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:50:20 id:1579027820 No. 95 >>116

>>94
>gab-fugee
>Lmao wait you got banned from gab for being a transphobe?
>
>That's rich, what was the message that got you banned?

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)13:56:40 id:1579028200 No. 96 >>104

>>78
Trannies should be shot in the head and dumped in a mass grave

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:33:05 id:1579026785 No. 97 >>101

>>69

>
>I hate you now 'cause I'm only a measly 120.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:01:56 id:1579028516 No. 98 >>107

>>90

>
> "That was too many words! Summary plz."
> "Here is summary."
> [replies with a lot of words]
>
>

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)13:38:37 id:1579027117 No. 99 >>100

>>80

>
>Cheers, mate. Two thumbs up fer yer reply
>

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:02:21 id:1579028541 No. 100

>>99

(@Lennart@spinster.xyz) 14/01/20(Tue)13:39:29 id:1579027169 No. 101 >>102

>>97

@Judenfreund
>bro don't feel bad your only a brainlet because you haven't yet opened your mind up to all the high IQ ideas that exist out there
>Here, this is where your journey to Brain Intelligence starts:

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 14/01/20(Tue)14:03:22 id:1579028602 No. 102 >>131 >>132

>>101

@Lennart i washed my balls and brushed my teeth today !

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)14:03:01 id:1579028581 No. 103

>>76
I used to have one of those when I was a little kid. Intellivision was dope

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:02:43 id:1579028563 No. 104 >>105

>>96

>
>No, people who write shit like YOU do should be ... you know.

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)14:03:31 id:1579028611 No. 105 >>106 >>121

>>104
shut up faggot nobody cares about your homosexual sympathies

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:04:24 id:1579028664 No. 106 >>108

>>105

>I do, but not all homosexuals are pedos btw

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:04:24 id:1579028664 No. 107

>>98

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)14:05:01 id:1579028701 No. 108 >>109 >>110

>>106
JoJo we can agree to disagree about that

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:05:25 id:1579028725 No. 109

>>108

>BITCH FUCK YOU

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:06:46 id:1579028806 No. 110 >>111 >>113 >>230

>>108

>I'M NOT A PEDO, I AM NEVER GOING TO BE ONE BTW

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)14:07:11 id:1579028831 No. 111 >>112

>>110
I hope you're right

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:08:06 id:1579028886 No. 112

>>111

>I HOPE YOU'RE RELIGIOUS AND SOCIAL PROPAGANDA GETS YOU TO BE A MEAN PERSON

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)14:08:16 id:1579028896 No. 113 >>114

>>110
nobody wants you to go out like kevin spacey, hiring hitman to kill the victims of your sexual assaults

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:08:42 id:1579028922 No. 114 >>115

>>113
WHY NOT? PEDOS SHOULD DIE

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)14:09:40 id:1579028980 No. 115 >>118

>>114
Yes, but he had the three people who were accusing him of rape killed so in this case the pedo lived and the victims died

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:01:16 id:1579028476 No. 116 >>117 >>128

>>95

>
>No, not for being "transphobic", that was Mastodon. On Gab the neo-Nazis got me kicked off for posting this pic, which was a pic that one of the neo-Nazis had ORGINALLY posted on Gab to me - with Stars of David superimposed on each of the homo baldies in the pic. I'd removed the Stars of David and added the framed photo of homosexual SA co-founder and commander, Ernst Röhm, next to the swastika flag on the wall. So Torba gave ME and not the original posters the boot. Go figure.
>

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:09:56 id:1579028996 No. 117 >>127

>>116
ngl my dude that looks kinda gay

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:10:45 id:1579029045 No. 118 >>119

>>115

>this is disgusting

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)14:11:29 id:1579029089 No. 119 >>120

>>118
yes it is.

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:12:43 id:1579029163 No. 120

>>119

>I love homosexuals, but not homosexuals that molested I hate them at the bottom of my heart.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:11:26 id:1579029086 No. 121 >>122 >>125 >>126

>>105

>
>Nah, mate, I'm a cishet male who laughs at your pathetic attempts to insult me because I'M(!) confident enough of my heterosexuality not to be scared of gay people. Something that quite obviously can't be said about you.
>
>Here's something just for you, sweetie pie
>

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)14:12:16 id:1579029136 No. 122 >>123 >>124 >>136

>>121
Nobody is scared of gays, they are disgusted by them.

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:12:42 id:1579029162 No. 123

>>122
then why is it called homoPHOBIA, you big DUMMY??

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:13:22 id:1579029202 No. 124 >>129

>>122
phobia is the latin word for fear, obviously you didn't know that, BAKA

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:13:23 id:1579029203 No. 125

>>121

>WTF IS THIS? THIS IS DISGUSTING I HATE NAZISM TOO

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:13:38 id:1579029218 No. 126

>>121

>HEY he broke the rules

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:13:34 id:1579029214 No. 127

>>117

>
>Duh!

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:17:39 id:1579029459 No. 128 >>133

>>116
Okay, uh, you can post that, porn is allowed, but you have to mark this as NSFW. There's a little checkbox under the image after you upload it.
>

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)14:16:13 id:1579029373 No. 129 >>130 >>134 >>135

>>124
because the Jewish homosexuals that infiltrated psychiatry and reclassified homosexuality from a mental illness to a sexual orientation needed a trigger word to demonize heterosexuals who were repulsed and disgusted by faggotry being normalized across society

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:19:21 id:1579029561 No. 130

>>129
>repulsed and disgusted
>more like afraid to admit they are into hairy dudes

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:04:48 id:1579028688 No. 131

>>102

>
>I washed my teeth and brushed my balls.

(@LennartMathiassen@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:13:28 id:1579029208 No. 132 >>155

>>102

>damn bro ur blocked on spinster what are you not a feminist faggot?

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:21:17 id:1579029677 No. 133 >>142

>>128

>
>oops, sorry, mate

(@Oblivia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:29:49 id:1579030189 No. 134

>>129
consider that phobias are irrational fears, its perfectly rational to fear something that regularly harbors deadly diseases

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:31:11 id:1579030271 No. 135

>>129
didn't infiltrate psychiatry, they created it
>@fluffy

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:33:42 id:1579030422 No. 136 >>137 >>140 >>148

>>122
at gay men is rooted in a fear of being penetrated, coward sissyboy
>@Judenfreund

(@l0wk3y@dickkickextremist.xyz) 14/01/20(Tue)14:34:42 id:1579030482 No. 137 >>138 >>149

>>136
Oh man, you guys are talking to this moron again?

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:36:00 id:1579030560 No. 138 >>139

>>137

>@Judenfreund

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:36:23 id:1579030583 No. 139 >>151

>>138
i just go where I'm tagged tbh
>
>@l0wk3y

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)14:35:32 id:1579030532 No. 140 >>141

>>136
It should induce fear for a man to get fucked in the ass by another man. Nothing sissy about that. Sissy would be submitting to an assfucking

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:37:40 id:1579030660 No. 141 >>152 >>153

>>140
you admitted it! men secure in their masculinity don't worry about getting assfucked
>@Judenfreund

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:29:02 id:1579030142 No. 142 >>143 >>144

>>133

>
>oh, btw, I'd forgot to mention that the neo-Nazi nerds had also superimposed a Star of David over the swastika in the flag on the wall

(@Oblivia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:38:41 id:1579030721 No. 143 >>145

>>142
you keep images of homosexual acts, edit them, and post them on ur social media
>
>this is how others will see you, its inevitable

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:31:04 id:1579030264 No. 144 >>147

>>142

>
>I'm gunna grammar Nazi myself now - "I'd forgot" should have been either "I forgot" or "I'd forgotten", but NOT "I'd forgot". Sorry 'bout that.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:40:19 id:1579030819 No. 145 >>146

>>143

>
>write that to your neo-Nazi friends who originally posted the shit

(@Oblivia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:42:17 id:1579030937 No. 146

>>145
i actually know the guy who originally posted it, ace was a closet homo too and hates whites, hardly a 'nazi' lmao just some pommy fag with no self awareness

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:33:16 id:1579030396 No. 147

>>144

>
>And no, I did NOT misspell "gonna" - "gunna" is the Aussie version of "gonna".

(@VD15@fedi.valkyrie.world) 14/01/20(Tue)14:34:24 id:1579030464 No. 148

>>136
says the lesbian.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:35:26 id:1579030526 No. 149 >>150

>>137

>
>No, we're writing, not talking.

(@l0wk3y@dickkickextremist.xyz) 14/01/20(Tue)14:35:53 id:1579030553 No. 150

>>149
Ahh, carry on!

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:37:53 id:1579030673 No. 151

>>139

>
>Come on, mix it up a bit and tag where you've gone

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)14:38:34 id:1579030714 No. 152 >>162

>>141
I don't worry about it, not even when I was locked up.

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:46:31 id:1579031191 No. 153 >>154 >>156 >>157

>>141
this tbh
>
>who even thinks about gays? if you are a man go fuck cute girls and do cool shit why are you thinking about gays at all.
>
>It's the same feeling a woman gets when she is with a man, the one that leads to those twitter posts of thots saying shit like "omg i thought you were going to date rape me" when the guy was obviously the most beta of betas, cf. attached. Because women are keenly aware of how they are sexual objects for men, they make all sorts of these weird speculations. You are doing the same thing because you consider yourself a sexual target for men, specifically gay men.
>
>Meanwhile no gay man is going to fuck you if you're not looking for it because there are just tons of gays out there.
>
>straight men don't think about gays at all. buy socks and post thighs, nobody here will judge you if you're honest with yourself.
>

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:50:03 id:1579031403 No. 154 >>158

>>153
a lesbian autist I keenly relate to men who are vexatiously accused of behaving creepy towards women
>@Judenfreund

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 14/01/20(Tue)14:51:19 id:1579031479 No. 155 >>160

>>132

@LennartMathiassen na probably a mix of the loli, traps, bad jokes

(@Grandtheftautism@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:51:31 id:1579031491 No. 156

>>153
I often find myself pondering gays, like "Would they like this apricot jelly on a peanut butter sandwich?" and "Do they like carnations better than roses?" and "I wonder if gays would choose the Black and Decker blender over the Hamilton Beach one". There are so many questions

(@surasanji@blob.cat) 14/01/20(Tue)14:49:15 id:1579031355 No. 157 >>159

>>153
be fair that dude is famously awkward and often comes off a bit creepy.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:53:50 id:1579031630 No. 158

>>154

>
>Creepy Death
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXWq3f01e2U

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)14:58:55 id:1579031935 No. 159 >>300

>>157
the C word is discriminatory against non-Neurotypicals

(@LennartMathiassen@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:15:00 id:1579032900 No. 160 >>161

>>155

>so much for free speech smh keep spreading the good word my mouse from another set of parents ✊
>My spinster account is shadowbanned on that instance and they also blocked my FSE even though I ain't never posted no gay shit rip me

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 14/01/20(Tue)15:16:25 id:1579032985 No. 161 >>163

>>160

@LennartMathiassen traps arent gay smh

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:22:34 id:1579033354 No. 162 >>173

>>152
literally just said "what man wouldn't be afraid of getting fucked in the ass" now you're saying you aren't?
>bro you lyin
>@Judenfreund

(@LennartMathiassen@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:20:23 id:1579033223 No. 163 >>164

>>161

>bro if you're a guy and like feminine shit your gay
>It's not an original observation but liking women is literally the gayest shit

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 14/01/20(Tue)15:23:38 id:1579033418 No. 164 >>167 >>177

>>163

@LennartMathiassen liking real women is gay, but traps arent gay, because they do bro shit and dont smell like tuna

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:13:29 id:1579032809 No. 165 >>166

>>83

>
>This is a track I wrote for her two years after she passed away (it's called "Sternchen", of course):
>
>https://my.pcloud.com/publink/show?code=XZ1EUQ7Z2RE5EtThXwfQ1bVpnMh0TJhHKPXV

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:24:52 id:1579033492 No. 166 >>174 >>175

>>165
This is cool. It has a very Sega Genesis feel to it.

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:24:54 id:1579033494 No. 167 >>168 >>169 >>170 >>188

>>164
smells great you manbaby
>@LennartMathiassen

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 14/01/20(Tue)15:25:21 id:1579033521 No. 168 >>171

>>167

@georgia femboy cock smells better you womanbaby

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:25:52 id:1579033552 No. 169

>>167

>
>hell yeah - 'ken oath it does!

(@J@anime.website) 14/01/20(Tue)15:26:50 id:1579033610 No. 170 >>180

>>167
like to pour basil on my girl's snatch, throw it in the air fryer for just 5 mins or so. Smells and tastes delightful.
>@a7

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:28:13 id:1579033693 No. 171 >>172

>>168

>@Judenfreund

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 14/01/20(Tue)15:29:26 id:1579033766 No. 172

>>171

@georgia if you arent cleaning your femboys cock thats your failure as an owner

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)15:27:57 id:1579033677 No. 173 >>179

>>162
No I said it would be a normal to be afraid of it, not that I was afraid of getting fucked in the ass

(@Kommando@neckbeard.xyz) 14/01/20(Tue)15:28:25 id:1579033705 No. 174

>>166

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:30:31 id:1579033831 No. 175 >>176

>>166

>
>Ta, mate. "Sega Genesis" - so you reckon it sounds like Mike Rutherford playing "Sonic the Hedgehog"? ROFL

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:32:21 id:1579033941 No. 176 >>182

>>175
Well, haha, I that is the guitar sound common in a lot of Genesis games, Sonic sounds different.

(@LennartMathiassen@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:31:52 id:1579033912 No. 177 >>178

>>164

>my man this fella is 100 % pink that shit ain't hard admit it you fucking pussy
>

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 14/01/20(Tue)15:34:37 id:1579034077 No. 178 >>195

>>177

@LennartMathiassen ya its more feminine than a woman, cuter, has a cock and can fight me out of any tough situation ?

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:35:46 id:1579034146 No. 179 >>181 >>184

>>173

>
>you: people don't hate gay people cause they fear gay people, they hate them cause they're disgusting
>
>me: hatred of gay men is rooted in a fear of being penetrated, you're a coward sissy for fearing it
>
>you: fear of getting assfucked is perfectly normal and I'm not a sissy, the real sissies are people who get assfucked
>
>me: only men insecure in their masculinity fear being assfucked
>
>you: n-n-not me! other men! not me, I'm so manly I went to prison
>
>sure thing dude
>
>@Judenfreund

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:37:47 id:1579034267 No. 180

>>170

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)15:36:59 id:1579034219 No. 181 >>183 >>189

>>179
reread what I wrote, I said it was normal to fear assrape, and that it would be gay to submit to assrape, never did I mention my personal feelings towards assrape. you're putting words in my mouth

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:37:06 id:1579034226 No. 182 >>192

>>176

>
>Well, this one's a bit different to that (I wrote it as a birthday present a few years ago for my biological progenitor - the words "dad" and "father" are reserved for the man who adopted me when I was a kid). It's called RBP:
>
>https://my.pcloud.com/publink/show?code=XZEch87ZRgvzJPOH0Q0tD6s8HNARHHxw1Dxk

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:39:21 id:1579034361 No. 183 >>186

>>181
was calling you a coward and you responded to say other men aren't cowards? seems legit
>@Judenfreund

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)15:38:56 id:1579034336 No. 184 >>185

>>179
I guess it should be expected it's a common Jewish tactic to distort someone's words and add a jewish slant to them.

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:40:28 id:1579034428 No. 185 >>190 >>196

>>184
literally the obvious interpretation of your words but nice job blaming jooz
>@Judenfreund

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)15:40:08 id:1579034408 No. 186 >>187 >>194 >>198

>>183
No, you called me a sissy, and I said it would be sissy to let someone fuck you in the ass

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:42:42 id:1579034562 No. 187 >>197

>>186
called you a "coward sissyboy". the first part of your response to this pejorative was to refute that you were a coward and the second part was a refutation of being a sissy
>@Judenfreund

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:44:48 id:1579034688 No. 188 >>193 >>200 >>218

>>167
gross no
>
>well, it's not really an equal comparison
>
>women have to wash that shit every day diligently sometimes multiple times, being extra careful when you piss, or else it smells literally like rotting flesh.
>
>A guy who puts in half of the work girls do they would smell like roses and lilac.
>
>But in the end probably dudes smell worse. Girls are very sensitive to smells, and gossip, and social tension, and tons of other totally useless things (which actually are incredibly useful for a sidekick, the man+woman compliment is so fucking good when you get it right). Autistic girls are super qt tho, I dated and was serious with a HFA girl, it was 10/10. Same body type as this pic but more narrow at the waist. Still miss that thing... Truly, the gods take the best of us.
>
>Damnit I need a drink.
>

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:39:17 id:1579034357 No. 189

>>181

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:43:33 id:1579034613 No. 190 >>191

>>185

>
>Speaking of "blaming jooz", check this out
>
>https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/982961/Iran-accuses-Israel-stealing-clouds-affecting-country-climate-change-news-weather

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:45:15 id:1579034715 No. 191 >>205

>>190
my favorite are the conspiracies of Israel sending animal spies, there's even a wikipedia page about them
>@fluffy

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:45:40 id:1579034740 No. 192 >>241

>>182
This is good stuff, man. I've been doing some music lately too. I should probably try to finish it up, I'm trying to turn some of these into an album. Here's a track people seem to like:
>

(@shit@pl.smuglo.li) 14/01/20(Tue)15:45:56 id:1579034756 No. 193 >>203

>>188
i really dont think girls are that sensitive to smells considering how much shit stanky perfume and scented candles and fuck knos wat other scented crap they using all the time

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:46:00 id:1579034760 No. 194 >>204

>>186
is this going to be one of those, pitching isn't gay, threads

(@LennartMathiassen@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:39:19 id:1579034359 No. 195

>>178

>that's exactly the point tho!?? dicks can be cute and all and that's the problem if you like that feminine soft stuff you're gay it's literally that simple
>Listen to yourself bro ,you need
>

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)15:41:30 id:1579034490 No. 196

>>185
No, it's literally your Jewish interpretation of my words. I was speaking generally and you took it to mean that I was speaking about myself.

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)15:45:26 id:1579034726 No. 197 >>206

>>187
No, I was saying it is a normal response for a straight man to fear getting fucked in the ass, and it would be much more sissy to submit to getting in the pooper. I never said anything about me at all. You're inferring all of this additional meaning yourself with your jewy interpretation

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:46:42 id:1579034802 No. 198 >>199 >>202 >>209 >>213

>>186
This is gonna be controversial, but I think it's gayer to stick it in a dude's pooper than for a dude to stick it in yours.

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:47:30 id:1579034850 No. 199 >>201 >>207

>>198
damnit
>

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:47:49 id:1579034869 No. 200 >>208 >>210 >>211

>>188
have to wash that shit every day diligently sometimes multiple times, being extra careful when you piss, or else it smells literally like rotting flesh."
>hahahaha women don't wash their vaginas, they're self-cleaning. some douche but that's despite medical advice.
>
>@Judenfreund

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:47:57 id:1579034877 No. 201

>>199

>this is the worst thread ive ever seen

(@canidaeportent@kiwifarms.cc) 14/01/20(Tue)15:48:59 id:1579034939 No. 202

>>198

>It is only gay if the balls touch.
>@quaylessed

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:48:58 id:1579034938 No. 203 >>231

>>193
This image will form an argument in one direction or another, but in my experience, it only smells bad if the lady does not use Hygiene to perform cleanliness.
>

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)15:47:00 id:1579034820 No. 204

>>194
No, it's a georgia trying to call me a fag and failing miserably kind of thread

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:47:08 id:1579034828 No. 205

>>191

>
>yeah, I vaguely remember reading about that CT

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:49:10 id:1579034950 No. 206 >>215

>>197
man, I totally believe you're 100% heterosexual like every other virulent gayhater. lol.
>@Judenfreund

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:49:43 id:1579034983 No. 207 >>214

>>199
PROVE ME WRONG YOU CAN'T

(@LennartMathiassen@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:48:49 id:1579034929 No. 208

>>200

>yeah tell em only guys are supposed to douche their p**hole

(@ArdanianRight@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:49:54 id:1579034994 No. 209 >>212

>>198
By that logic it's gayer to bang a chick in the butt than it is to get pegged by a chick.

(@Grandtheftautism@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:50:52 id:1579035052 No. 210 >>216 >>219

>>200
I'm pretty sure my wife washes her tang daily but now I have to ask >:(

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:50:56 id:1579035056 No. 211 >>225

>>200

>>It's estimated that 75% of all women will have at least one in her lifetime, and 40%-45% will have multiple cases.
>>Balanitis is inflammation of the glans penis and is a common condition affecting an estimated 3-11% of males.
>
>Wash your cunt

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:51:26 id:1579035086 No. 212 >>217 >>228 >>235

>>209
No, it's the opposite there.
>
>You don't have to have boners to lie back and think of England, but you gotta get excited for man-butt to stick it to a guy.

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)15:49:58 id:1579034998 No. 213

>>198
I'll defer to JoJo on this matter

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:51:32 id:1579035092 No. 214

>>207

>I....I can't
>
>What does this MEAN!??

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)15:51:04 id:1579035064 No. 215 >>246

>>206
Lucky for me what you believe doesn't matter in the least bit. You're a jew homosexual. you're opinion is literally worthless.

(@LennartMathiassen@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:52:18 id:1579035138 No. 216 >>220

>>210

>bro why do you think you're supposed to wash your mouth with soap when you're naughty it's so that your wife doesn't have to do that shit by herself

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:52:59 id:1579035179 No. 217 >>221

>>212
with modern medicine you don't even have to be aroused to stick it into someone
>
>get with the times old man where are your party drugs

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:53:13 id:1579035193 No. 218 >>224

>>188
a woman you dated had a vagina that "literally smell[ed] like rotting flesh" and "need to be washed three times a day" shes probably post-op trans. #sorrynotsorry
>@Judenfreund

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:53:37 id:1579035217 No. 219

>>210
i am honestly pretty interested
>
>gonna go out today and use this as a pickup line, will report back with results

(@Grandtheftautism@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:53:38 id:1579035218 No. 220 >>223

>>216
her answer was "WTF? GET OFF THE INTERNET YOU WEIRDO" so now I'm in trouble and I still don't have an answer

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:53:51 id:1579035231 No. 221

>>217
Even modern medical science can't prove me wrong.

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:53:48 id:1579035228 No. 222

>>80

>
>To be fair, I imagine *most* things would barely register

(@LennartMathiassen@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:54:20 id:1579035260 No. 223

>>220

>women, eh? I feel you bro

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:54:33 id:1579035273 No. 224

>>218

>

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:55:36 id:1579035336 No. 225 >>226 >>227

>>211
is terrible advice, women who douche are more likely to get yeast infections
>@Judenfreund

(@LennartMathiassen@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:56:31 id:1579035391 No. 226

>>225

>just add vinegar to the douche and yeet that yeast

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:57:11 id:1579035431 No. 227 >>232 >>234 >>243 >>247

>>225
This is correct, as I understand it: attempting to flush it out with fluids will disrupt the pH and local biome. But you do have to sanitize the region and remove the centipedes and stuff, I feel fairly certain of this.

(@ArdanianRight@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:55:44 id:1579035344 No. 228 >>229

>>212
This is actually a good point.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:57:27 id:1579035447 No. 229

>>228
Thank you, I heard it from Tyra Banks.

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:56:23 id:1579035383 No. 230 >>238

>>110

>
>Hey now, it's not so bad; it's not like everybody hates you for something you can't choose or smthn

(@Anunnakey@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:58:16 id:1579035496 No. 231 >>233

>>203

>This is anti pain spray, this girl is frigid now

(@Grandtheftautism@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:59:07 id:1579035547 No. 232

>>227
so THAT'S what those tiny little roach motels under the bathroom sink are for. I feel grateful that she's been quietly keeping the centipedes at bay all this time, what a heroine

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)15:59:54 id:1579035594 No. 233 >>236

>>231
Oh, why would she need a local analgesic spray? The only thing I can think of is the most dreaded move in all of soccer.
>

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:00:38 id:1579035638 No. 234 >>239

>>227
you have to wash your vulva but no differently than you wash any other external part of the body, maybe a little gentler
>@Judenfreund

(@ChristiJunior@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:00:17 id:1579035617 No. 235 >>237 >>240

>>212
Tons of gays have managed to have kids, so that "excitement" obviously doesn't require genuine sexual attraction.
>
>That said, fucking another dude in the ass is still gay as hell, just slightly less demeaning (?) than being on the receiving end. Wasn't that the understanding in places like ancient Rome, that it was only the act of receiving that undermined your manhood?

(@Anunnakey@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:01:11 id:1579035671 No. 236

>>233

>We might have a work with trans with balls

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:01:38 id:1579035698 No. 237

>>235
right about the Rome part
>@p

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:01:47 id:1579035707 No. 238 >>249

>>230
everyone hates footfags too but i had a friend who was footfag and I didn't know for years rip
>
>you don't have to fucking tell people all your creepy fetishes, it puts them in a bad situation for your own selfish reasons. How is someone supposed to be nice to you without suffering reputational damage if your defining characteristics are social suicide?
>
>Nobody gives a fuck if you like to watch vore or whatever but if you try to make a big thing out of changing vore to be socially accepted people who are nice to you are party to your conspiracy.
>
>It's a shit move, nobody wants to choose between being friendly while getting pulled into some activism shit and being a dick. It's selfish and rude and antisocial.

(@LennartMathiassen@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:02:05 id:1579035725 No. 239 >>244

>>234

>damn girls are fucking lucky us guys have to use this shit :/
>

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)16:02:12 id:1579035732 No. 240 >>242

>>235
yes, the greeks and romans who pioneered faggotry thought it was shameful to get it in the ass but totally chill to give it to a prepubescent boy in the ass

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:03:17 id:1579035797 No. 241 >>245

>>192

>
>Mate, I don't why, but it's totally distorted when I try to play it. It sounds like something very loud was recorded with the input volume dial/slider on max, absolutely destroying the sound, making it totally unrecognisable. Damn, I would have loved to be able to hear it the way it's supposed sound. Could it be cause I'm still running Win7? Sounds silly, but who knows?

(@ChristiJunior@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:04:04 id:1579035844 No. 242 >>268

>>240
That reminds me:
>
>An Italian and a Greek get in a fight over sex.
>
>Greek: The Greeks invented sex centuries before the Italians!
>
>Italian: Maybe so, but we improved on it by introducing it to women!

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:05:35 id:1579035935 No. 243

>>227
yes the centipides can become quite the issue if left alone for long enough. After long enough they will subvert the good moral structure of the vagina and turn it into a penis

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:06:18 id:1579035978 No. 244 >>264

>>239
i fucking hate that, haven't used it since they forced us to in junior high school
>
>no complaints

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:06:50 id:1579036010 No. 245 >>269

>>241
It's like that because that is the song. Like, here's a FLAC version.
>

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:06:33 id:1579035993 No. 246 >>251

>>215

>
>That's right, "you're opinion" IS literally worthless, you moron. Go back to school and learn the basics of the English language.

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 14/01/20(Tue)16:07:59 id:1579036079 No. 247 >>248

p (@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:08:25 id:1579036105 No. 248

>>247

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:09:14 id:1579036154 No. 249 >>250 >>253

>>238

>
>And yet people get their lives ruined over it or killed all the time; if that's not a reason to be an activist then what is?

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:11:45 id:1579036305 No. 250 >>252 >>255

>>249
there is no reason to be an activist because politics is for shitposting and nothing more.
>
>activists are literally just larpers, what the fuck are you upset about if you get rich enough you can do whatever the fuck you want literally just

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)16:12:01 id:1579036321 No. 251 >>257

>>246
guess you have never used a cel phone with predictive text before? grammar nazi faggot

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)16:13:56 id:1579036436 No. 252 >>254

>>250
I agree, the only politics that matters is where and how you spend your money. Anything else is larping since the whole thing is rigged anyways

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:14:47 id:1579036487 No. 253 >>258 >>260

>>249
People get their lives ruined over gambling addiction, heroin addiction. Both of these things can get you killed, both are caused by biological predilections. Which do you prefer, to advocate for gamblers' rights or to keep gamblers from ruining themselves?

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:15:30 id:1579036530 No. 254 >>261

>>252
I speculate that it can matter if you are very wealthy.

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:15:11 id:1579036511 No. 255 >>256

>>250

>
>" there is no reason to be an activist"
>
>"because politics is for shitposting and nothing more."
>:megadoubt:
>
>"activists are literally just larpers, what the fuck are you upset about if you get rich enough you can do whatever the fuck you want literally just stop being poor"
>
>r/wowthanksimcured

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:16:12 id:1579036572 No. 256

>>255
meme guy.png

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:14:41 id:1579036481 No. 257 >>263

>>251

>
>That's right, I've never used a "cel phone" Mate, you should quit while you're behind. ROFL

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:15:58 id:1579036558 No. 258 >>259

>>253

>
>That's because addiction can be cured.

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:19:30 id:1579036770 No. 259 >>304

>>258
long term alcoholism causes permanent irreversible damage to your brain.
>
>It cannot be cured. There is no going back. You can stop drinking, but the neural pathways are formed and, as with most addictions, even a single beer will send an alcoholic on a bender.
>
>Same with gambling. Put a gambling machine in front of a "cured" gambler and watch his eyes.
>
>This is not exactly what I would call a cure, your usage of this term is excruciatingly loose.

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)16:18:40 id:1579036720 No. 260 >>271

>>253
gamblers rights. this nanny state bullshit about saving people from themselves is lame af. why do i care if some asshole can't gamble responsibly? or do heroin, or any other thing that is a victimless act? It's far more annoying and gay to have a nanny state ban everything and treat people like adult children

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)16:19:27 id:1579036767 No. 261 >>262

>>254
even if you're not it matters. If you don't like soulless corporations like walmart don't buy shit there

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:21:14 id:1579036874 No. 262 >>276

>>261
In theory.
>
>In practice 99% of people will do whatever the media coverage is and you are helpless to affect that.

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)16:16:25 id:1579036585 No. 263 >>266

>>257
you really are a faggot. I don't care about spelling, and you only look stupid for nitpicking about spelling and grammar on social media.

(@LennartMathiassen@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:18:02 id:1579036682 No. 264 >>265

>>244

>haha yeah those were the days when we'd all go full kids in a sandbox on each other with those little bastards
>#nostalgia

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:22:54 id:1579036974 No. 265 >>273

>>264
>childhood flashbacks intensify
>Come over here dave, ted, hold him down, come on dave it's part of your homework quit squirming

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:19:38 id:1579036778 No. 266 >>267

>>263

>
>
>
>Oh dear, I think our pretend-hetero neo-Nazi is a little bit
>

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)16:25:22 id:1579037122 No. 267 >>272 >>308

>>266
You're a tranny supporting fag who whines about spelling online. you are about as interesting as georgia is. the funny thing is you're so butthurt about me calling you a fag that you're trying to insult me and failing and just look like a straight bitch

(@ArdanianRight@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:15:55 id:1579036555 No. 268

>>242
Saying the Greeks invented sex is like saying Street Fighter 1 invented fighting games. Sure it was technically first, but nobody really enjoyed or remembered it after 2 came along.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:16:06 id:1579036566 No. 269 >>270

>>245

>
>OK, I've downloaded the flac file, now I've just got find out what software I need to be able to play it.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:27:13 id:1579037233 No. 270 >>294

>>269
Ha, VLC works, I think.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:29:57 id:1579037397 No. 271 >>274 >>298 >>348

>>260
Sure. I don't mind someone destroying themselves. But this guy's argument is that we should stop people's proclivities from ruining them, because he's advocating for rights for pedophiles. I think it's fine that there's a social stigma for ruining your life gambling or for wanting to bang kids.

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:28:49 id:1579037329 No. 272

>>267

>
>
>
>https://freespeechextremist.com/notice/9r08hsqhCrnaDGFriS

(@LennartMathiassen@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:29:15 id:1579037355 No. 273

>>265

>it's honestly a shame that more pedophiles don't go down the teacher route I mean we need more educators and stuff and it seems like the perfect incentive

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:31:29 id:1579037489 No. 274 >>275 >>278 >>309

>>271

>We used to think someone was weird if they don't want a family now it's normal. I don't even know where to begin with social stigmas anymore since I think hanging out with most degenerates is completely pointless

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:32:06 id:1579037526 No. 275 >>277

>>274

>I honestly want to by myself

(@Holot@neckbeard.xyz) 14/01/20(Tue)16:32:06 id:1579037526 No. 276

>>262

>FUCKING NORMIES!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:32:39 id:1579037559 No. 277 >>279

>>275

>pardon?

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:32:49 id:1579037569 No. 278 >>282

>>274
I'm a big fan of degenerates in general. Social stigma is a good way to ensure that things work out: people will not tend to defy a stigma unless they are certain of what they're doing.

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:33:25 id:1579037605 No. 279 >>280 >>283

>>277

>to be by myself

(@ELR@fedi.absturztau.be) 14/01/20(Tue)16:34:22 id:1579037662 No. 280 >>281

>>279
are you not already yourself?

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:35:14 id:1579037714 No. 281 >>285 >>286

>>280

>I'm bored and drunk

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:35:17 id:1579037717 No. 282

>>278

>
>lol yeah depends who it works out for. yeah it works out for people who are safe and independent - red flags stand out.
>
>doesn't help the people who are victimized.

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:35:34 id:1579037734 No. 283 >>284

>>279

>don't be so hard on yourself mate

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:35:49 id:1579037749 No. 284 >>287

>>283

>what you mean?

(@ELR@fedi.absturztau.be) 14/01/20(Tue)16:35:42 id:1579037742 No. 285

>>281
send pic by private

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:36:22 id:1579037782 No. 286 >>289 >>290

>>281

>you drunk mate!?

(@ELR@fedi.absturztau.be) 14/01/20(Tue)16:36:19 id:1579037779 No. 287 >>288

>>284
he is in love of you

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:36:49 id:1579037809 No. 288

>>287

>Who love?

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:37:18 id:1579037838 No. 289 >>292

>>286

>you're CUTE

(@ELR@fedi.absturztau.be) 14/01/20(Tue)16:37:06 id:1579037826 No. 290 >>291 >>293

>>286
shaman, i know your feelings but trying to have sex with a person in such moments is a crime

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:37:27 id:1579037847 No. 291 >>295

>>290

>mate gross

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:37:43 id:1579037863 No. 292

>>289
help
>
>

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:37:49 id:1579037869 No. 293

>>290

>yum

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:35:41 id:1579037741 No. 294 >>302

>>270

>
>No sweat, I remembered that I've got the K-Lite codec pack installed which lets me play it on WMP. Still sounds exactly like before though, distorted beyond all recognition.. I'm sorry, but if that's what it's supposed to sound like, I can't deal with it at all, so, regretfully, I can't return the compliments. :-(

(@ELR@fedi.absturztau.be) 14/01/20(Tue)16:37:53 id:1579037873 No. 295 >>296

>>291
mating great*

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:38:03 id:1579037883 No. 296 >>297

>>295

>
>you wish perv

(@ELR@fedi.absturztau.be) 14/01/20(Tue)16:38:22 id:1579037902 No. 297

>>296
that is always

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)16:35:54 id:1579037754 No. 298 >>299 >>325

>>271
Anyone arguing for pedo rights is a retard. Why not argue for serial rapists rights as well, they're people too. I am fine with pedos being killed for the first offense. Their needs to be a stigma for being a child molester, because it's an evil act to victimize an innocent child

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:41:24 id:1579038084 No. 299

>>298
this tbh.
>
>i have a strong sense of justice and even someone who is born to want to murder people, if he grows up so that he gets along with society and overcomes his urges, i will not harass.
>
>It seems completely stupid to push for acceptance of people who have urges to murder.

(@surasanji@blob.cat) 14/01/20(Tue)16:41:44 id:1579038104 No. 300 >>301 >>303

>>159
don't know if he's not or is neurotypical. I just know he comes off desperate and cringey

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:44:22 id:1579038262 No. 301

>>300
desperate and cringe boys should be pitied and helped. Ideally, we would arrange for him to get a good wife which would fix his desperation and she could teach him to be more socially savvy the way women do well.
>
>He is not an unskilled guy, just a victim of post-obesity epidemic scarcity. Same guy would have been married with children 100 years ago.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:45:15 id:1579038315 No. 302 >>305 >>306 >>351 >>562

>>294
Ha, no worries. Some people do not like it. Maybe most people. I like it.
>
>This one is somewhat less distorted.
>

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:47:05 id:1579038425 No. 303

>>300
Yeah it's a hard question I guess, what to do about how men are desperate and cringey when pulled out of what has been the ordinary way of things for so long.
>
>I don't think there's any hope to set up some waifu, state/society provided waifus for beta male workers, while the bread and butter of all civilization, has no place in a society where women have rights. So something else must be done to make the beta males work as hard as they have.
>
>Or I suppose we could implement automation and only the elites get waifus but those are the only guys who are repairing robots anyway everyone else can just go be miserable. Which more or less is the situation right now.
>
>It's not great, this stuff is not helping my mood.

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:54:15 id:1579038855 No. 304 >>307 >>318

>>259
you quit drinking one drink will send you off the deep end, you are forever an addict" is a myth.
>the disease model of addiction is rooted in 12-step pseudoscience.
>https://www.salon.com/2015/06/27/addiction_is_not_a_disease_a_neuroscientist_argues_that_its_time_to_change_our_minds_on_the_roots_of_substance_abuse/ https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/97270/1/NEJMra1602872.pdf
>@bahn

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:53:17 id:1579038797 No. 305

>>302

>
>Nah, sorry, mate, I'm probably too old. Listened to 20 secs and HAD TO turn it off. Can't deal with that at all. Sorry.

(@endlessmike@kiwifarms.cc) 14/01/20(Tue)16:53:44 id:1579038824 No. 306

>>302
One day these will be as good as crazybus.

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)17:00:20 id:1579039220 No. 307 >>311

>>304

>
>he's talking about extreme addicts
>
>salon is a bad scientific source.

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)16:58:15 id:1579039095 No. 308 >>320

>>267
are about as interesting as Georgia is
>nice job complimenting him
>
>here's a tip for you bro:
>no one winning an argument has ever said
>"it doesn't matter what you say, your opinion is worthless because you're (foo)"
>@Judenfreund

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)17:05:52 id:1579039552 No. 309 >>310

>>274

>
>
>"since I think hanging out with most degenerates is completely pointless"
>Degens need friends too

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)17:06:15 id:1579039575 No. 310 >>313

>>309
great they've got each other
>

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)17:09:34 id:1579039774 No. 311 >>312

>>307

>
>While I agree that Salon is a terrible source, it's right in this circumstance

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)17:11:56 id:1579039916 No. 312 >>315

>>311
just saying you're a dick if you smoke crack in front of an ex crack head, alcohol can be like that to some people too they just don't like to be around it after ruining their lives.
>
>some people are more impulsive than others and handle their addiction differently.
>

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)17:10:28 id:1579039828 No. 313 >>314

>>310

>
>And they've got you and me.
>
>I'm sure you've got a few degen friends of your own and don't know it

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)17:13:00 id:1579039980 No. 314 >>316

>>313
i consider most degenerates so yes ofc, i find no interest in befriending sex degenerates any more than crime degenerates
>
>

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)17:12:51 id:1579039971 No. 315

>>312

>
>This I can definitely agree with

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)17:13:45 id:1579040025 No. 316 >>317

>>314

>
>My motto is "don't drag me into it, and we're good"

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)17:14:23 id:1579040063 No. 317

>>316
or unwilling/illegal age participants too?
>

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)17:14:29 id:1579040069 No. 318 >>319

>>304

>
>>salon.com
> are you trolling me that you actually read this website seriously? what's next, citing the daily stormer?
>>utoronto.ca
> wew utoronto. You know their reputation in terms of sociology, right? Well let's take a loo-
>`Review Article`
>
>This isn't research this is an opinion piece lmao what are you doing, academics write opinion pieces all the time it's basically a formal blogpost
>
> discarded
>
>Well it might still be true, but probably I would need to research it since it contradicts so much of my life experience. Anyway I like opinion pieces because they are very lite so I'll try to read it anyway, maybe there will be some insight and direction.

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)17:17:37 id:1579040257 No. 319 >>353 >>362

>>318

>she's just doing a strawman:
>
>>it's not a disease!!!
>you never said it was a disease
>
>>proceeds to cite a bunch of shit sources
>
>obviously addiction is psychological and thus everyone handles it differently. some alcoholics may never want to be within 5ft of alcohol ever again and that's a fine coping mechanism. is that a psychological pathway? "I don't want to be within 5ft of alcohol" yes it is.

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)18:12:47 id:1579043567 No. 320 >>321 >>322

>>308
It isn't an argument, you're calling me gay, I am am hetero. You're just retarded if you insist on telling me what my sexual orientation is

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)18:14:05 id:1579043645 No. 321 >>323

>>320
>I am a hetero
>are you tho

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)19:03:40 id:1579046620 No. 322 >>333

>>320
argument isn't that you're gay. I was kidding. my argument is that when you say you're not afraid of gay men raping you you're full of shit.
>@Judenfreund

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)18:15:51 id:1579043751 No. 323 >>324

>>321
Yes. I am married and have a kid.

(@cowanon@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)18:55:56 id:1579046156 No. 324 >>357 >>358 >>359

>>323

>I am married and have a kid.


FUKKEN NORMIES REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE









GET OUT NORMIES OOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUTTT









@quaylessed

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)17:11:50 id:1579039910 No. 325 >>326

>>298

>
>"Anyone arguing for pedo rights is a retard."
>>
>
>"Why not argue for serial rapists rights as well, they're people too."
>Because they, ya know, rape people?
>
>"I am fine with pedos being killed for the first offense."
>Ok boomer.
>
>"Their needs to be a stigma for being a child molester, because it's an evil act to victimize an innocent child"
>https://freespeechextremist.com/notice/9poV8A1XkwNHVuKh2O

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)18:10:57 id:1579043457 No. 326 >>327 >>356

>>325
Pedophiles rape children, so your retard logic doesn't compute. You're probably a pedophile if you're trying to normalize child rape and make it acceptable.

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)19:21:48 id:1579047708 No. 327 >>328 >>330

>>326

>
>"Pedophiles rape children"
>So do non-pedos (in fact even more so than pedos), so what's your point?
>
>"You're probably a pedophile"
>
>Noooo, totally not
>
>"if you're trying to normalize child rape and make it acceptable."
>I'm only going to say this once. I LOATHE rape, especially child rape. I would gladly murder one with my own hands if presented to me.

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)19:22:17 id:1579047737 No. 328 >>329 >>360

>>327

>
>untag please

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)19:23:53 id:1579047833 No. 329

>>328
tbh. I do not consent to pedo discourse.
>@bahn

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)19:42:50 id:1579048970 No. 330 >>331

>>327
non pedophiles don't rape children because if they did, they would be pedophiles. There is so much retard in your posts it isn't even worth responding to you

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)19:46:44 id:1579049204 No. 331 >>332 >>335 >>361

>>330
you're wrong there. pedophiles are people sexually attracted to children. most people who molest children aren't pedophiles, just scumbags.
>@bahn

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)19:47:19 id:1579049239 No. 332

>>331
muting this

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)19:43:37 id:1579049017 No. 333 >>334

>>322
not gay, not afraid of anal rape, sorry you're wrong.

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)19:52:00 id:1579049520 No. 334 >>337

>>333
you say buddy. not afraid of gays just like you aren't afraid of Jews.
>@Judenfreund

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)20:14:51 id:1579050891 No. 335 >>336

>>331
that's complete retard gibberish. A pedophile is a child rapist, or someone who wants to rape children.

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)20:20:50 id:1579051250 No. 336 >>363

>>335

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)20:15:42 id:1579050942 No. 337 >>338

>>334
I am not afraid of Jews you're really reaching now, lol

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)20:40:05 id:1579052405 No. 338 >>339

>>337
you believe paranoid conspiracies about Jews so retarded even fse resident Nazis cringe but you're not afraid of them. gotcha.
>@Judenfreund

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)20:41:22 id:1579052482 No. 339 >>340

>>338
How could I be afraid of a tribe of inbreds so cowardly they can't even fight their own wars, and shoot unarmed children?

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)20:46:53 id:1579052813 No. 340 >>341

>>339
denial isn't a good look for you. your hatred is rooted in fear, as are most hatreds.

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)20:54:54 id:1579053294 No. 341 >>342

>>340
First, I don't hate anyone. Second, I know that you are a jewish homosexual carrying out an agenda to normalize child rape as your talmud demands. Jews and pedophilia go hand in hand. That's why hollywood is full of pedophilia because it is full of Jews. Maimonedes and simeon bar yohai the two most famous rabbis in all of judaism repeatedly upheld the jewish right to child rape as described in the talmud and refused to condemn it.

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)20:57:39 id:1579053459 No. 342 >>343

>>341
you "don't hate anyone" your lies keep getting bolder. not even gay people right lmao

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)21:11:24 id:1579054284 No. 343 >>344 >>345

>>342
I don't hate gay people, I feel sorry for them because 99 times out of ten they were molested as children and permanently fucked up from it so they turn to faggotry.
>
>Don't change the subject though, are you not familiar with these verses from the Talmud?
>
>They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it should cause defilement by seminal emission so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with him.... It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl [communicates defilement] from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux. This is obvious!
>
>Avodah Zarah 36b-37a
>
>R. Joseph said: Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition [intercourse], and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; [if a niddah] she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon [a person afflicted with gonorrhoea].
>
>Sanhedrin 55b
>
>Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that.24 (24) I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum.
>
>Sanhedrin 54b
>
>Raba said. It means this: When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this [three years old], it is as if one puts the finger into the eye; but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown-up woman he makes her as 'a girl who is injured by a piece of wood.'...
>
>Kethuboth 11b
>[This debate concerns whether or not someone is a virgin. Virginity is prized above all, such that it is believed that a girl under the age of three will regain her virginity, even if a man has had intercourse with her. (Fn. 7 says, in regard to putting "the finger into the eye": "I.e., tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.") Since virginity is prized above all, one could assume that this conclusion has allowed grown men to have sex with little girls with immunity. A grown-up woman is not deflowered by having sex with a small boy, however, since he is only like a "piece of wood."]

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)21:19:03 id:1579054743 No. 344 >>346

>>343

>"one could assume, since virginity is prized above all" what bullshit. none of these say sex with kids is permissible. the three year one in particular is easily debunked
>http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/three.html

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)21:21:11 id:1579054871 No. 345 >>371

>>343
also you literally said you hated gay people in our last discussion.

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)21:21:24 id:1579054884 No. 346 >>347

>>344
It's in the talmud. I have read it myself, the soncino translation. how can you sit there and lie about it? oh that's right, you're a jew homo trying to get pedophilia legalized so your tribe doesn't have to rape their victims in the shadows anymore.

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)21:43:32 id:1579056212 No. 347 >>499

>>346
i literally just posted a link debunking it but keep making that tard cum

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)17:04:52 id:1579039492 No. 348 >>349

>>271

>
>"Sure. I don't mind someone destroying themselves."
>😬
>
>"But this guy's argument is that we should stop people's proclivities from ruining them"
>I, for one, prefer people alive and well
>
>"because he's advocating for rights for pedophiles."
>I hold both views, but they aren't connected to each other.
>
>"I think it's fine that there's a social stigma for ruining your life gambling"
>*for not trying to rid themselves of the addiction
>
>"or for wanting to bang kids."
>Most MAPs really don't want to...
>(at least, most that I have talked to)

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)00:13:20 id:1579065200 No. 349 >>350 >>366

>>348

>
>Whatever 0x01f62c is, I don't go slapping donuts out of people's hands. I figure most people are old enough to make their own decisions, and it's none of my business. They want to live a clean life, destroy themselves, or stick somewhere in the middle like the rest of us, whatever. Fine with me. I do not have cause to interfere in most adults' business.
>
>> I, for one, prefer people alive and well
>
>You know who's alive and well? Cattle. Freedom means pain and suffering. Grow up.
>
>> I hold both views, but they aren't connected to each other.
>
>They certainly are if we take your premises as a given. A predilection that people cannot help but that will destroy their lives, often with collateral damage.
>
>> Most MAPs really don't want to
>
>Excellent. Activism completely unnecessary, then!
>
>Incidentally, [citation needed], and whether pedophiles want to or not is immaterial: they do it often enough. Most addicts don't want to ruin their lives.

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)00:17:41 id:1579065461 No. 350

>>349
way to pickem apart p

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)17:15:07 id:1579040107 No. 351 >>352

>>302

>
>I feel like a right arse now, sending you this after having not been able to cope with your music, but I'm gunna do it anyway!
>
>It's called Díky (Czech for "thank you") and was written as a birthday present for a Czech friend (Czech mate, grin, grin) I had some years ago:
>
>https://my.pcloud.com/publink/show?code=XZJx4Y7ZWptIYWuJEDStFI1xP3LWA0ie2muX

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)00:24:16 id:1579065856 No. 352

>>351
Nah, man, it's not something I take personally if someone does not like the music, no worries.
>
>I like the beat on this one a lot.

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)17:29:16 id:1579040956 No. 353 >>354

>>319

>
>Gonna go against (with) the grain and say that addiction *is* a disease

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)00:27:09 id:1579066029 No. 354 >>355

>>353
Doesn't matter for the purpose of the argument I was making. It's a predisposition towards something harmful.

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)00:30:13 id:1579066213 No. 355 >>398

>>354
very few vices result only in pain for the individual involved - even gambling and drugs can harm loved ones

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)00:46:37 id:1579067197 No. 356 >>364 >>369 >>370

>>326

>
>> You're probably a pedophile
>
>Dude, check his bio. He's a pedophile.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)00:50:06 id:1579067406 No. 357

>>324

(@dielan@shitposter.club) 15/01/20(Wed)01:00:59 id:1579068059 No. 358

>>324

(@pasture@gamers.exposed) 15/01/20(Wed)01:07:18 id:1579068438 No. 359 >>368

>>324

@cowanon IF YOURE NOT AN INCEL YOURE NOT ALLOWED IN MY CLUB

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)19:24:20 id:1579047860 No. 360

>>328
Aight

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)03:13:09 id:1579075989 No. 361 >>367 >>478

>>331
I can't come up with a reason to do so without an attraction to children.

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)04:10:29 id:1579079429 No. 362 >>372

>>319

>I got so drunk I fall asleep

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)20:28:25 id:1579051705 No. 363

>>336
I don't care about your retard gender studies pseudoscience. Pedophiles are kiddie diddlers, their victims grow up to be abusers who continue the cycle of abuse. You can read that retard shit trying to normalize child rape all day, it doesn't make a difference to me. It does make me think of this though:
>
>"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools" Romans 1:22

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)00:59:23 id:1579067963 No. 364 >>365

>>356

>
>Reading comprehension, who needs it?

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)04:24:58 id:1579080298 No. 365 >>449

>>364

>MAP

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)00:32:20 id:1579066340 No. 366 >>399

>>349

>
>"I figure most people are old enough to make their own decisions, and it's none of my business. They want to live a clean life, destroy themselves, or stick somewhere in the middle like the rest of us, whatever. Fine with me. I do not have cause to interfere in most adults' business."
>There's a difference between letting someone destroy themselves, and letting a disorder (addiction) destroy them. They aren't in their right mind to make the choice themselves.
>
>"You know who's alive and well? Cattle. Freedom means pain and suffering. Grow up."
>One can still minimize that suffering, which is the *grown up thing to do*.
>
>"Excellent. Activism completely unnecessary, then!"
>Then you don't understand what the activism is about.
>
>"and whether pedophiles want to or not is immaterial: they do it often enough."
>And whether men want to rape or not is immaterial: they do it often enough.
>
>"Most addicts don't want to ruin their lives."
>Great, then let's help them help themselves!

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)06:39:20 id:1579088360 No. 367 >>401

>>361
the same way rape is more about power than sex (ie ugly women can get raped) child rape is more about power than sex. the features of true pedophiles and most child molesters are different, there are different demographics, etc
>@Jojothegoodperson

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)06:40:21 id:1579088421 No. 368

>>359
about volcels
>@cowanon

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:10:16 id:1579093816 No. 369

>>356

>YOU'RE RIGHT P THE CUTIE

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:10:40 id:1579093840 No. 370

>>356

>MAP = Man-Alien-Predator

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 14/01/20(Tue)21:22:49 id:1579054969 No. 371 >>373

>>345
just like i hate the jew's sinful degenrate lifestyle, but I don't hate jews.

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 15/01/20(Wed)08:11:11 id:1579093871 No. 372 >>374 >>375 >>376 >>378

>>362
what were you drinking JoJo? I imagine you were drinking white wine or some sort of girly drinks with little umbrellas in them. Or were you drinking shots, or beers or something?

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:11:49 id:1579093909 No. 373

>>371

>I find it very amusing that you, a pimp convict, are calling MY lifestyle "sinful and degenerate". I've led a far more ethical life than you, and so has the average Jew or gay person.
>@Judenfreund

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:11:52 id:1579093912 No. 374 >>380

>>372

>I wasn't drinking, I was sleepy

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:11:59 id:1579093919 No. 375

>>372

>I never drinked

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:12:45 id:1579093965 No. 376 >>377 >>381 >>403

>>372
underage he shouldnt be drinking anything
>@Jojothegoodperson

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:13:14 id:1579093994 No. 377

>>376

>THIS ACCUSATION IS BAD I THOUGHT YOU WERE MY FRIEND

(@oxbowcoda@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:13:44 id:1579094024 No. 378 >>379

>>372
Maybe he was drinking NASA's moon landing Kool-Aid.

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:14:38 id:1579094078 No. 379

>>378

>EXCUSE E

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 15/01/20(Wed)08:14:32 id:1579094072 No. 380

>>374
I thought I saw a post where you said you were dunk and fell asleep

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 15/01/20(Wed)08:15:20 id:1579094120 No. 381 >>382 >>385 >>391

>>376
that doesn't mean anything, I started drinking and smoking weed at like 13

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:15:41 id:1579094141 No. 382 >>383

>>381

>Oh god dave is awake

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:16:18 id:1579094178 No. 383 >>384

>>382
oh god yes
>@quaylessed

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:16:42 id:1579094202 No. 384 >>386

>>383

>No, go to sleep you're too much for threads

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:16:45 id:1579094205 No. 385 >>387 >>396

>>381
man I smoke a lot and I think 13 is too young - explains a lot mate
>
>

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:17:04 id:1579094224 No. 386

>>384
I just can't help being right literally all the literal time

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:17:09 id:1579094229 No. 387 >>388

>>385

>SMOKING IS BAD

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:17:22 id:1579094242 No. 388 >>389

>>387
yes it is

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:17:35 id:1579094255 No. 389 >>390

>>388

>THEN WHY ARE YOU SMOKING?

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:17:59 id:1579094279 No. 390 >>392

>>389
bored lazy lonely?
>
>

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:18:45 id:1579094325 No. 391

>>381
explains a lot actually
>@Dave420

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:19:07 id:1579094347 No. 392 >>393

>>390

>lol

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:19:44 id:1579094384 No. 393 >>394

>>392
I have a medical card mate, it can fix all of those ailments according to my medical marijuana dispensary clerk
>

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:20:28 id:1579094428 No. 394 >>395

>>393

>I'll throw it away, except IN NORTH KOREA, THAT'S WHY YOUR USERNAME HAS A 420 IN IT BTW

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:21:08 id:1579094468 No. 395

>>394

>p-please! don't!~ it's my medicine
>

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 15/01/20(Wed)08:21:40 id:1579094500 No. 396 >>397

>>385
damn near every kid in California starts smoking around that age

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 15/01/20(Wed)08:21:59 id:1579094519 No. 397

>>396
would explain a lot about the state also
>

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)06:06:19 id:1579172779 No. 398 >>434 >>442 >>494

>>355
Yes, that's not relevant here, though, as it also applies to pedophilia. My argument is that he's applying different standards to pedophilia than gambling or heroin addiction, because it's sexual. Pedophilia is harmful to kids, but in the worst case, gambling and heroin addiction make you useless and desperate enough to cause other problems.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)06:40:54 id:1579174854 No. 399 >>400 >>445

>>366

>
>> There's a difference between letting someone destroy themselves, and letting a disorder (addiction) destroy them. They aren't in their right mind to make the choice themselves.
>
>I'm happy to apply this logic to pedophiles as well.
>
>> One can still minimize that suffering
>
>Give me a fucking break, even you don't believe that. You want to minimize suffering? End sentient life. Congratulations, total suffering is now zero.
>
>> Then you don't understand what the activism is about.
>
>You do this when you don't have an argument, and it's stupid. An apparently deliberate failure to understand along with an insinuation that you are the only one that knows what they're talking about. There are only three reasons to make an insinuation instead of an argument: you don't want to talk about it (clearly not the case here, as you hopped into the thread to make it about pedophilia), you don't want to spell it out because that means committing to an argument (slippery pedos, amirite), or you know that what you believe is indefensible.
>
>Now, as I was saying, if pedos don't wanna bang children, then there is no cause to put any activism behind.
>
>> And whether men want to rape or not is immaterial: they do it often enough.
>
>That's retarded. Quit the disingenuous bullshit. Nearly half (44%) of the total number of sexual assaults in the US had an underage victim. 15% of them are under the age 12. Unless a sixth of the population is pedophiles,
>
> we have a small percentage of the population committing an outsized proportion of the total number of rapes.

(@jeff@social.i2p.rocks) 16/01/20(Thu)06:42:06 id:1579174926 No. 400 >>486

>>399
i actually suspect its about 1 out of 5 are pedo in usa.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)08:21:44 id:1579180904 No. 401 >>402 >>408 >>430

>>367

>
>> in the same way rape is more about power than sex
>
>That's what I was talking about. This is a claim that became a mantra without ever being substantiated. If it were about power, we would not have the patterns we have in victims: 80% are under 30, 90% are female. Sure, ugly women get raped: ugly women also get laid plenty. A drunk guy is more likely to commit a rape for the same reason he's more likely to take a swing at someone: it's mostly people with poor impulse control.

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)08:36:29 id:1579181789 No. 402

>>401

>
>rape is about power is typical projection. women feel powerless, so they think it must be about power.
>
>Most of the confusion between the sexes is caused by this sort of projection.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)08:50:44 id:1579182644 No. 403 >>404 >>405 >>409 >>411 >>447

>>376
Jojo is 24.
>
>Whether he should drink or not is debatable; this is a different question from whether it's illegal.
>
>But given that there have been suggestions that he is underage, and that I did tell self-admitted pedophiles will be banned for interacting with underage users, and that hopped in to reply to Jojo (and turn a regular, non-pedophilia thread into a pedophilia hellthread), let's say that in an unofficial capacity as a resident of FSE I'd suggest he just block Jojo and leave him alone, and in an official capacity as a guy that is liable for all the shit here, this is close enough to interacting with a minor to warrant a yellow card next time.

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)08:55:39 id:1579182939 No. 404

>>403

>EXCUSE ME, ARE YOU BASICALLY CALLING ME AMINOR?

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)08:59:33 id:1579183173 No. 405 >>406 >>462

>>403

>P THIS MUST STOP BITCH, I'M NOT A FUCKING MINOR I'M WARNING YOU P, THIS IS DISGUSTING TO DO. I'M NEVER MINOR.

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)09:01:10 id:1579183270 No. 406 >>407

>>405

>P, WHY HAS YOUR MENTALITY EXPIRED BTW?

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)09:03:09 id:1579183389 No. 407

>>406

>DON'T GIVE THE FUCKING YELLOW CARD JUST BECAUSE YOU THINK I'M A MINOR, I THOUGHT WE WERE FRIENDS.

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)09:42:35 id:1579185755 No. 408 >>465

>>401
are other factors in why most female victims are young (average of mid twenties iirc), they're more vulnerable and more likely to be around the men who are the primary perpetrators of rape (men in their late twenties and early thirties). it's more than "poor impulse control" or "uncontrollable lust", forcible rape is an act of violence. I'm not saying rape isn't about sex, just that its more about power and control, and sex is the means, not the end. its not just feminists saying that, its sexologists and psychiatrists studying the motives of rapists. the typology of rapists is traditionally: anger rapist, power rapist, and sadistic rapist, only the third is primarily sexually motivated and its not just a normal sexuality that can't be controlled, its a deviant sexuality.
>@Jojothegoodperson

(@freemo@qoto.org) 16/01/20(Thu)09:06:20 id:1579183580 No. 409 >>410

>>403

@p

I'm so confused by this. Not that its my business, but how is taking to (or even being sexual with) a 24 year old considered pedophilia?

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)09:45:11 id:1579185911 No. 410 >>413 >>431 >>467

>>409
not, but there's significant evidence that JoJo is underage. p just says he's 24 cause he has an agreement with JoJo that if JoJo claims his age is 15 like he was earlier he'll get banned.
>@p

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)10:06:30 id:1579187190 No. 411 >>412

>>403
can we just ban minors

(@canidaeportent@kiwifarms.cc) 16/01/20(Thu)10:07:47 id:1579187267 No. 412

>>411

>It is too late. This is the decade of Jojo. Just embrace your new master and prepare your butt for smacking.
>@p

(@freemo@qoto.org) 16/01/20(Thu)10:25:28 id:1579188328 No. 413 >>414

>>410

@georgia

If he literally said he was 15 then I get it. Makes sense

@p

(@J@anime.website) 16/01/20(Thu)10:34:07 id:1579188847 No. 414 >>415 >>470

>>413
tells everyone he's 15 in DM for some reason, even though he's been doxed and we know he's actually 17.
>@georgia

(@freemo@qoto.org) 16/01/20(Thu)10:37:34 id:1579189054 No. 415 >>416

>>414

@J

LOL well if he is admiting he is 15, truth or not, then he brought it on himself.

@georgia

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)10:38:20 id:1579189100 No. 416 >>417

>>415

>Yes, That's why I'm sorry

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)10:38:30 id:1579189110 No. 417 >>418 >>419

>>416

>I did admit

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)10:39:02 id:1579189142 No. 418

>>417

>I'm sorrry

(@freemo@qoto.org) 16/01/20(Thu)10:40:07 id:1579189207 No. 419 >>420 >>471

>>417

@Jojothegoodperson

In that case I'm on team P then. I mean he probably shouldnt let you on the server at all if there is adult content. Though then again if he has an admited pedo on his server, even if everyone is above 18, not sure that is any better.

@J

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)10:40:35 id:1579189235 No. 420 >>421

>>419

>I wanna be on the server

(@freemo@qoto.org) 16/01/20(Thu)10:41:24 id:1579189284 No. 421 >>422

>>420

@Jojothegoodperson

Understandable. Sadly the world isnt fair for a 15 year old. There are lots of things you want to do you cant, thats the law so not much anyone can do about it.

@J

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)10:43:24 id:1579189404 No. 422 >>423 >>424

>>421

>But I'm sorry

(@freemo@qoto.org) 16/01/20(Thu)10:43:54 id:1579189434 No. 423

>>422

@Jojothegoodperson

You have nothing to apologize for, at least not to me.

@J

(@J@anime.website) 16/01/20(Thu)10:45:30 id:1579189530 No. 424 >>425 >>426

>>422
are you apologizing to people? You know P shields you anyway. You'll be 18 soon. Just chill and ride it out until then lol
>@freemo

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)10:46:06 id:1579189566 No. 425 >>427 >>472

>>424

>Okay, But he outright bans people I know him

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)10:46:35 id:1579189595 No. 426

>>424

>gomen ne gomen ne gomen ne gomen ne gomen ne gomen ne gomen ne gomen ne gomen ne gomen ne

(@freemo@qoto.org) 16/01/20(Thu)10:47:16 id:1579189636 No. 427 >>428

>>425

@Jojothegoodperson

My curiosity has been satisifed and I now understand why P reacted the way he did. thanks for explaining it.

I'm checking out of the conversation now, please untag me.

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)10:47:34 id:1579189654 No. 428

>>427

>okay man

(@Judenfreund@freespeechextremist.com) 14/01/20(Tue)02:03:01 id:1578985381 No. 429

>>8

>
>You're just a narrow-minded dipshit.

(@leyonhjelm@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)11:48:56 id:1579193336 No. 430 >>433 >>474

>>401
I think the "it's about power" argument is a misleading approach to the truth of an inherent quality of rape being a forcible act. By this standard, a lot of crimes are "about power" if you fail hard enough at clear communication.

(@freemo@qoto.org) 16/01/20(Thu)10:12:32 id:1579187552 No. 431 >>432

>>410

@georgia

Fair, can you give an example of "significant evidence" here. Considering the anonymity of the internet im curious what sort of evidence someone might have.

@p

(@fluffy@blob.cat) 16/01/20(Thu)11:56:30 id:1579193790 No. 432 >>435 >>475

>>431
There is an audio stream he joined where he spoke at length. I was shown it by kiwifarms users. He sounds extremely young: there is no chance in my mind he is 24. Men of that age don't sound or speak this way, in my opinion. In addition, there are screenshots of posts where he writes he is actually 15. I would sooner believe 13 than 23.
>
>I invite you to ask e.g. for the primary source material and draw your own conclusions.
>
>I don't actually have anything against jojo but I have a strict no talk to minors policy because I make many lewd posts.

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)12:00:02 id:1579194002 No. 433

>>430

>
>it's probably illuminating to think about gay rape instead of Mf rape since it is the same but there has been much less propaganda muddling the matter.

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)12:31:20 id:1579195880 No. 434 >>436

>>398
ah okay, thanks for explanation

(@freemo@qoto.org) 16/01/20(Thu)11:58:00 id:1579193880 No. 435

>>432

@fluffy

He admited in this thread publicly that he has said he was 15. So no need for evidence, it seemed like it was solved by his own admission.

@georgia

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)12:34:22 id:1579196062 No. 436 >>437

>>434

>I'm so lonely

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)12:34:52 id:1579196092 No. 437 >>438

>>436
moooooooooo~

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)12:35:45 id:1579196145 No. 438 >>439

>>437
SERIOUS

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)12:36:34 id:1579196194 No. 439 >>440

>>438
I'm a cow
>
>

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)12:36:54 id:1579196214 No. 440 >>441

>>439

>I'm stressed today

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)12:37:11 id:1579196231 No. 441

>>440
what is wrong?
>
>

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)14:57:01 id:1579204621 No. 442 >>443 >>480

>>398

>
>Pedophilia isn't harmful to kids any more than heterosexuality is harmful to people of the opposite sex.

(@Dave420@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)14:57:34 id:1579204654 No. 443 >>444

>>442
not cool bro

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:02:12 id:1579204932 No. 444 >>451

>>443
admin told me not to respond to this guy but I feel like I have to respond to this guy. Listen dude, molesting children is a terrible thing. And you're in denial of pedophilia right? It's called a map it's right there in your profile bio. So are you going to start being sexual towards children because I can get you banned. I am best friends with the admin and if you mess with me, you better watch out. Got it?
>@bahn

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:04:21 id:1579205061 No. 445 >>446 >>485

>>399

>
>"I'm happy to apply this logic to pedophiles as well."
>Are you happy to apply it to LGBT as well?
>
>"You want to minimize suffering? End sentient life. Congratulations, total suffering is now zero."
>It's also possible that suffering is near infinite, as the process to end suffering in this manner would cause tremendous suffering in order to carry it out.
>
>"Now, as I was saying, if pedos don't wanna bang children, then there is no cause to put any activism behind."
>Or perhaps, we don't want to have to hide our identities for fear of our lives and livelyhoods?
>
>"Unless a sixth of the population is pedophiles, we have a small percentage of the population committing an outsized proportion of the total number of rapes."
>Being a pedophile is not required to commit sexual assault; it isn't even in the majority!

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:07:03 id:1579205223 No. 446

>>445
is where we had the most repulsive thing I have ever read. why are you acting all happy and chilly when you're literally a freaking pedophile? This is not funny, under any circumstances. Pedophilia is a terrible thing and it's immoral. Society as a whole doesn't even like pedophilia. So why are you a pedophile? And also it's called statutory rape so stop acting retarded.
>@p

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:06:40 id:1579205200 No. 447 >>448 >>489

>>403

>
>Yes, because constant disagreement is a danger.

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:11:41 id:1579205501 No. 448

>>447
you mean of the constant disagreements of society?
>@p

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)14:55:27 id:1579204527 No. 449 >>450

>>365

>
>Hi to you too

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:15:02 id:1579205702 No. 450

>>449
are you trying your best to psychologically sexualize me?
>@Judenfreund

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:27:19 id:1579206439 No. 451 >>452 >>453

>>444

>
>"Listen dude, molesting children is a terrible thing."
>Correct.
>"And you're in denial of pedophilia right?"
>Incorrect.
>"It's called a map it's right there in your profile bio."
>I know what I MAP is.
>"So are you going to start being sexual towards children"
>No.
>"I am best friends with the admin"
>

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:28:08 id:1579206488 No. 452

>>451
its true though p is the leader of the JoJo fan club

(@MilquetoastQT@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:33:26 id:1579206806 No. 453 >>454 >>455

>>451
Holy fuck this dude is creepy.
>
>SOCIAL OSTRACISM TIME
>SHUN
>SHUN
>SHAME
>SHAME

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:33:59 id:1579206839 No. 454 >>457

>>453
unironically tho

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:39:05 id:1579207145 No. 455 >>456

>>453

>
>Oh no, degradation, my kink

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:39:44 id:1579207184 No. 456 >>460 >>461 >>490 >>491

>>455
so THATS why you have an account here

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:39:28 id:1579207168 No. 457 >>458

>>454

>
>Bruh, what did I do

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:40:23 id:1579207223 No. 458 >>459

>>457
stop talking to JoJo

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:43:05 id:1579207385 No. 459 >>492

>>458

>
>Why? He's talking to me, it'd be impolite to not respond

(@Jojothegoodperson@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:50:54 id:1579207854 No. 460

>>456
hunt kids on the fediverse
>@bahn

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)19:32:17 id:1579221137 No. 461

>>456
>she just figured it out
>good job

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 17/01/20(Fri)00:01:49 id:1579237309 No. 462 >>463

>>405
You gotta stop this rageposting. You'll have less apologizing to do afterwards if you do, man.

(@daughter) 17/01/20(Fri)00:04:35 id:1579237475 No. 463 >>464 >>522

>>462

>
>Listen, just always be 100% right when you ragepost and you’ll never need to apologize.

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 17/01/20(Fri)00:27:47 id:1579238867 No. 464

>>463
tru

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 17/01/20(Fri)05:55:19 id:1579258519 No. 465 >>466 >>533

>>408

>
>> forcible rape is an act of violence
>
>This makes my case: violence is more often committed by people with poor impulse control. According to the BJS (PDF attached), 37% of those charged with rape had prior felony convictions (36% across people charged with any violent felony), and 13% had violent priors (15% across all violent offenses). If it was substantially different from other types of violent crime, it'd look different.
>
>For murders, there is a strong correlation between method and IQ. On the low end you have strangulation, followed by bludgeoning, and at the top you have bombs. Surely, Uncle Ted's dragging up the average, and there is some selection bias (stupid attempted bombers are more likely to blow themselves up), but we can discard that and the trend holds for other methods: on average, poisoners > shooters > stabbers > bludgeoners. High time preference and poor impulse control favor the direct methods. Violent rapists, no surprise, have a lower IQ on average (83) than other violent offenders (95). That's the other PDF. (This is the only info I could find. The sample size (136 prison inmates, that is, convicted offenders) was small, 10 were rapists. There's another with a larger sample, but worse data: inmates referred to the author (data red flag 1) for pretrial evaluations (data red flag 2), i.e., those charged but not convicted and that had not yet plead guilty. It found lower but not significant differences: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.sci-hub.tw/pubmed/475583 .)
>
>> it's more about power and control
>
>This has never actually been demonstrated to be the usual case. The BJS PDF again, 99.5% of those arrested for rape are men. Nothing else came close to that ratio. Across all violent offenses, 14% of the arrests were women. Power doesn't account for that kind of swing in the numbers, but aggregate differences in response to sexual frustration does account for it.
>
>If it actually were the case that the higher levels of Mazlow's Hierarchy were steering the lower levels (but only for this!), you wouldn't see rapes plummet after the introduction of internet porn. You only see this trend for rapes: other violent offenses stay stable no matter how high the increase in internet prevalence in the region, but you give people more porn and rape plummets. Guys don't rape so much when they have instantaneous, private access to ammunition for the old Ham Howitzer. The obvious answer is that the motivation to do so goes away.
>
>But the main problem is that there has been nothing that substantiates the claim that rape is actually about control. There are certainly outliers for any type of crime, but the overwhelming majority of robbery is about money, nearly all murder is about eliminating an obstacle or an object of hatred. Carjackers take the car to a chop shop as quickly as they can. Addicts are trying to calm the shakes. Nearly all crime is about achieving an end, consequences be damned.
>
>The claim originated with Susan Brownmiller, whose name I had to look up. I'd never read an excerpt before, because it struck me as absurd, but it's worse than I thought: http://www.susanbrownmiller.com/susanbrownmiller/html/against_our_will.html "[Rape] is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear." That is the section she decided to put on her page to sell her book. "Conscious"! "All"! I must not have gotten the memo; the thought certainly never occurred to me. I don't know why it gained any credibility, because the absurdity should be obvious. It's the closing to her grand theory, her story of how rape was "discovered" by cave men, which rests on the (completely counter to fact) assumption that animals don't do it. It's presented with no evidence, it can be safely dismissed with no evidence.
>

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 17/01/20(Fri)05:59:47 id:1579258787 No. 466

>>465
quite a good post tbh

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 17/01/20(Fri)06:10:49 id:1579259449 No. 467 >>468

>>410
The deal was more that if I could maintain plausible deniability, meaning I saw nothing conclusive and he did not claim to be under 16, I did not have a good reason to ban.

(@freemo@qoto.org) 17/01/20(Fri)06:11:24 id:1579259484 No. 468

>>467

@p

It all seems reasonable enough to me now that I know the details

@georgia

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 17/01/20(Fri)06:36:56 id:1579261016 No. 469 >>544

Some vaginae do smell bad. Same reason some guys reek of balls the second they unzip: diet and hygiene.
>
>That's the nice thing about men's restrooms being completely drenched in urine: it masks the smell of the unwashed guy at the adjacent urinal (or in cases of great misfortune, the big, shitty steel trough with no dividers).

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 17/01/20(Fri)06:41:26 id:1579261286 No. 470 >>545

>>414
Wait, is 17? That would be great, it would mean no DOJ-mandated ban, but also that he's technically a minor and bahn would not be permitted to sully him. Best of both worlds.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 17/01/20(Fri)06:47:32 id:1579261652 No. 471 >>473 >>557

>>419
Well, so far the pedophile hasn't broken any rules, with the exception of talking to Jojo, though if he has interacted with any other minors, that'd work also.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 17/01/20(Fri)06:49:50 id:1579261790 No. 472

>>425
Yes, last time you said you were 15, you had to leave until you changed your mind and were 24 again. It makes me think you do this stuff on purpose.

(@daughter) 17/01/20(Fri)06:51:00 id:1579261860 No. 473

>>471

>
>The fact that you give someone who makes this claim such hysterical attention is beyond a joke. Fedi admins are not responsible for filtering the world from itself, you goddamn psychopaths.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 17/01/20(Fri)07:03:13 id:1579262593 No. 474

>>430
Yeah, or the historical materialist worldview: it's *always* about power, and power is *always* about dominance rather than capability. It's an ideology that precludes a win-win in every case.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 17/01/20(Fri)07:05:48 id:1579262748 No. 475 >>476

>>432
I have heard many people that sounded the wrong age.

(@freemo@qoto.org) 17/01/20(Fri)07:08:13 id:1579262893 No. 476 >>477

>>475

@p

Ahh the good ol' internet, where the women are men, the men are boys, and the boys are FBI agents.

@fluffy

(@cola@dickkickextremist.xyz) 17/01/20(Fri)14:53:22 id:1579290802 No. 477

>>476

>mmorpg: many men online roleplaying girls

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)14:55:14 id:1579204514 No. 478 >>479

>>361

>
>Power, closest victim; idk, ask them

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)08:23:39 id:1579353819 No. 479 >>481

>>478
The first is incorrect. That's been covered elsewhere.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)08:28:14 id:1579354094 No. 480 >>603

>>442
That's completely different. Two people screwing, all other things being equal, does not involve either of them developing a complex afterwards.

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)08:30:58 id:1579354258 No. 481 >>482 >>483 >>583

>>479
I've still yet to respond to that and you're acting like its settled

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)08:35:26 id:1579354526 No. 482 >>495

>>481
for pedophilia, which typically includes a prolonged period of grooming, you can't say its impulsive

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)08:43:18 id:1579354998 No. 483 >>484 >>584

>>481
my point is rape is not primarily about sexual gratification, not about power per se. I'll get to that though. don't rush me :P

(@fluffy@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)09:18:04 id:1579357084 No. 484 >>488

>>483
rape is definitely about horny and there are numerous facts to back that up, some of which were enumerated in P's excellent post.
>
>I am not sure that there has ever even been anything but philosophy to support the claim that some other thing is instead.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)09:18:48 id:1579357128 No. 485

>>445

>
>Untagged Jojo, because I told you to not tag Jojo.
>
>> Are you happy to apply it to LGBT as well?
>
>Disingenuous. It's your position that drug addicts should be prevented from hurting themselves, not mine. Who does it hurt if two guys joust in a broom closet or watch a gladiator movie with their dicks out? It doesn't affect anyone but the participants, and the participants presumably knew what they were getting into. So, instead of deflecting, answer: do you let people destroy themselves and potentially others, or do you interfere?
>
>> It's also possible that suffering is near infinite
>
>Don't give me these "college sophomore smoking a blunt and talking about his philosophy class" arguments. You're talking to an old man, I've been through all that. Stick to things you actually believe and spell them out, and while you're at it, try to understand the point before you try to counter the point.
>
>That point was that we're not here to reduce suffering. Life itself is suffering, and you will suffer more while you labor under the delusion that suffering ends before life does.
>
>> Or perhaps, we don't want to have to hide our identities for fear of our lives and livelyhoods?
>
>There's no reason to hide if you don't wanna fuck children. It was sarcasm: you say "Oh, pedophiles don't want to fuck children" and I say "Oh, I wonder why anyone would hate them, then!" Keep up, man. Your statement was absurd: pedophiles want to fuck children.
>
>> Being a pedophile is not required to commit sexual assault; it isn't even in the majority!
>
>As I said, a sixth of the rape victims are underage. Unless a sixth of the population is pedophiles, your stupid false-equivalence doesn't stand up to even lazy internet scrutiny. Pedophiles commit more assaults than the general population.

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:05:19 id:1579205119 No. 486 >>487

>>400

>
>It's nearly impossible to know for certain, but most estimates put it between 1 and 5 percent of the total population.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)09:19:24 id:1579357164 No. 487

>>486
Even at five percent, that makes rape three times more prevalent for them than anyone else.

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)09:28:47 id:1579357727 No. 488 >>585

>>484
was a good post, some of its arguments were weaker than others and I could debunk them now but I want to do it all in one post. gotta be in the headspace to do rape research.
>@Jojothegoodperson

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)09:31:19 id:1579357879 No. 489 >>493 >>497 >>536 >>608

>>447
As a response to the message where I tell you that the next time you tag Jojo, you get a yellow card, you tag Jojo. So here's your warning, it is the only one you're getting. You're free to advocate for whatever you like; that's an opinion, not an action.
>
>However, just like we don't ban Nazi opinions but did ban the Atomwaffen recruiter, you are free to argue whatever you like, but a self-admitted pedophile may not use FSE to communicate with anyone under 18 Again: this is your only warning. I advise you to read people's bios carefully.
>
>For my own purposes, because I am 42 hours behind the top of my notifications, UTC time is 14:31. Any interactions with minors after that and everyone else on the bus is gonna clap.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)09:39:49 id:1579358389 No. 490

>>456
Well, he does for now.

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 16/01/20(Thu)15:42:36 id:1579207356 No. 491

>>456

>
>Lmaoo

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)09:41:41 id:1579358501 No. 492 >>610

>>459
Because you just heard that it gets you a ban, probably.

(@GBCDude@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)09:42:00 id:1579358520 No. 493 >>509 >>587

>>489
so jojo is a kid? if anything you should ban for being a pedophile and report him to the FBI.

(@Ricotta@pl.765racing.com) 18/01/20(Sat)09:55:51 id:1579359351 No. 494 >>588

>>398
is harmful to kids
>Correction: Sex outside of marriage is harmful to kids.

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)11:31:40 id:1579365100 No. 495 >>496

>>482

>
>Pedophilia don't include anything, it's an attraction.

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu) 18/01/20(Sat)11:41:13 id:1579365673 No. 496

>>495
it's a criminal pathology of sexual assault and rape

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)11:35:14 id:1579365314 No. 497 >>498 >>595

>>489

>
>His bio, since you're being a stickler.
>

(@Please@kiwifarms.cc) 18/01/20(Sat)12:10:03 id:1579367403 No. 498

>>497
FAGGOT
>@p

(@PorkCow@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)13:02:02 id:1579370522 No. 499 >>500

>>347
I saw several sources citing the same chapters of the Talmud, but when I went to sacredtexts.org those entire passages were conveniently gone. Not better in context, but gone. I read a bit where moms are clearly permitted to have sex with their underage sons. " the passive adult does not incur guilt unless the other party is at least nine years and a day" is pretty clear. Is that or is that not in the Talmud? The link didn't debunk this stuff at all.

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)13:05:06 id:1579370706 No. 500 >>501 >>503 >>530

>>499
of the "evil Talmud" sites have straight up fake quotes, you should use a neutral source and look for the quote in it. like wikidocs or something.
>@quaylessed

(@l0wk3y@dickkickextremist.xyz) 18/01/20(Sat)13:06:29 id:1579370789 No. 501 >>502

>>500
Man, hard to believe the unhinged far-right would lie about something.
>
>Many such cases!

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)13:20:26 id:1579371626 No. 502 >>505

>>501
mean the Talmud is still an old-ass written by old-ass Jewish men so its got bad and just plain weird stuff in it (and some good stuff) but "its okay to fuck kids" is not in there once. theres stuff about whether a kid who's raped is considered to no longer be a virgin by Jewish law which are often presented as such though.
>@PorkCow

(@PorkCow@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)13:13:21 id:1579371201 No. 503 >>504

>>500
just link me to a talmud then. If 90% of search results can't be trusted, then I'll just keep bringing back the same thing.

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)13:23:48 id:1579371828 No. 504

>>503

(@l0wk3y@dickkickextremist.xyz) 18/01/20(Sat)13:23:47 id:1579371827 No. 505 >>506 >>508

>>502
There's some weird shit in the Christian texts as well.
>
>A lot if it gave me the creeps when I was a kid.

(@PorkCow@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)13:36:41 id:1579372601 No. 506 >>507

>>505
Most of what we usually have to address is "slavery" seemingly being used as a generic term for 7-year contracted employees and Ethan Hawk always claiming all historical accounts of extreme mutilation are things God told the Isrealites to do.
>
>As for the talmud, I don't really have a dog in this fight, but I'd have to buy one at a flea market to find out anything anyway. I'm out. You win.
>

(@georgia@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)13:38:58 id:1579372738 No. 507

>>506
ummmmm kay?

(@cola@dickkickextremist.xyz) 18/01/20(Sat)14:15:26 id:1579374926 No. 508

>>505
I mean if a mystical text doesnt give you the creeps at all is it really doing its job though?

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)15:28:57 id:1579379337 No. 509 >>510 >>511

>>493

>
>"if anything you should ban for being a pedophile"
>1) Not against the rules, and in fact would be a violation of the tenets of the instance.
>2) Technically he should ban JoJo for being underage.
>
>"and report him to the FBI."
>For what crime?

(@GBCDude@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)16:01:16 id:1579381276 No. 510 >>512 >>534 >>613

>>509
being a pedophile is a federal crime. and if jojo is underage then should do his job and make sure that FSE doesn't end up like Gab.

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 18/01/20(Sat)16:03:10 id:1579381390 No. 511 >>513

>>509

@bahn yo hook me up with some child slaves

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)16:05:50 id:1579381550 No. 512 >>515

>>510
a pedophile is a federal crime."
>>
>
>"and if jojo is underage then should do his job"
>By kicking JoJo on the street.
>
>"and make sure that FSE doesn't end up like Gab."
>I don't know anything about Gab except that it's a hellhole.

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)16:07:34 id:1579381654 No. 513 >>514

>>511

>
>

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 18/01/20(Sat)16:08:09 id:1579381689 No. 514 >>516

>>513

@bahn you are a pedo, you guys all have connections to child sex slaves right?

(@GBCDude@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)16:08:36 id:1579381716 No. 515 >>518 >>614

>>512
Gab is more than a shithole, it a FBI honeypot. And yes I agree with you that needs to do his job and ban who he needs to ban.

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)16:08:32 id:1579381712 No. 516 >>517

>>514

>
>That's not how any of this works...

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 18/01/20(Sat)16:08:59 id:1579381739 No. 517 >>519

>>516

@bahn lame - fucking loser smh

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)16:09:35 id:1579381775 No. 518 >>521

>>515

>
>Probably gonna tag in Grunk since technically JoJo is his jurisdiction.

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)16:10:40 id:1579381840 No. 519 >>520

>>517

>
>If you're gonna be an evil monster, do it yourself and leave me out of it.

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 18/01/20(Sat)16:11:15 id:1579381875 No. 520 >>523

>>519

@bahn you can use the pictures when you fap latter

(@GBCDude@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)16:11:17 id:1579381877 No. 521

>>518
Okay, do what you have to do. Since nobody is sure if jojo is 24 or 15 years old.

(@p@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)16:14:16 id:1579382056 No. 522

>>463

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)16:15:14 id:1579382114 No. 523 >>524 >>615

>>520

>
>You disgust me.

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 18/01/20(Sat)16:15:55 id:1579382155 No. 524 >>525

>>523

@bahn thanks

(@GBCDude@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)16:21:03 id:1579382463 No. 525 >>526 >>528

>>524
why is almost every single person on this thread is a degenerate?

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 18/01/20(Sat)16:21:34 id:1579382494 No. 526 >>527

>>525

@GBCDude idk, why are you a faggot?

(@GBCDude@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)16:23:19 id:1579382599 No. 527 >>529

>>526
that's not what your mother said last night.
>

(@bahn@freespeechextremist.com) 18/01/20(Sat)16:23:25 id:1579382605 No. 528

>>525

>
>The mystery of the internet

(@a7@pleroma.mouse.services) 18/01/20(Sat)16:24:12 id:1579382652 No. 529 >>531

>>527

@GBCDude i am atf?

(@quaylessed@pleroma.quaylessed.icu)